Nina Anderson, author of ‘Worse Than Global Warming – Wave Technology’ has suggested that possible interference from unscheduled frequencies could have influenced the aircraft’s “brain”.

As a researcher of the potential influence that atmospheric frequency could have, she’s urged the crash investigators to look at the possibility of wave interference.

According to Anderson, wireless technology is rampant and the unseen hazards from this technology could influence our health, behaviour and maybe aircraft controls. And she has asked the question of one major plane-maker of fly-by-wire aircraft (where signals replace mechanical or hydraulic actuators of control surfaces and engine operation) if shielding has been upgraded to account for the increase in frequency ranges from the growing wireless world.

The aircraft manufacturer did not have an answer.
As Anderson has found, weapons are no match for ground-based frequency manipulation. She says reconnaissance aircraft of today are, in many cases, just large remote-controlled toys. At times, pilots have seen an aircraft develop its own agenda. If that aircraft is a fly-by-wire machine, it is plausible that something caused the interference, be it atmospheric, turbulence, thunderstorm activity, static electricity or – quite possibly – a rogue frequency.

Anderson says it is time to look at frequency saturation and its potential for disaster before it is too late. –John Newton