FALCONSW workshops to focus on stakeholders’ Sydney landside needs

MAJOR issues on air freight transport developments in south eastern Sydney have resulted in a series of workshops being planned to consider industry stakeholder’s priorities when addressing deficiencies in landside infrastructure.

The move was initiated at an executive committee meeting of the Freight and Logistics Council of New South Wales (FALCONSW) in Sydney, when hearing progress on a study it commissioned into 2lst century freight transport.

The main thrust of this study by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) is to consider what practical solutions could improve the efficiency of the air and sea supply chains around Botany Bay and Sydney International airport.

“The first of these workshops was held on July 14 in Newcastle, where FALCONSW and PwC collaborated with the Hunter Business Chamber and the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport,” said Hugh McMaster, acting executive officer of FALCONSW. “The workshop discussed the needs of the freight and logistics sector and its customers in the Central Coast/Hunter regions over the short (two-year), medium (five-year) and long (10-year) terms. “This includes the role of Williamtown airport as a regional freight hub.

“Other workshops are planned for Sydney and regional New South Wales in coming weeks. Members of the business community, including the freight and logistics sector that have an interest in the development of a better freight infrastructure network or improved network access in the Hunter/Central Coast region of NSW are encouraged to attend the workshop,” said McMaster.

He said FALCONSW had commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers to develop “a practical road map for efficiency improvements in the New South Wales freight and logistics sector”.

PwC would conduct the review of the state’s key freight supply chains under the title of ‘Actions for NSW Freight and Logistics Industry Efficiencies and 21st Century Sustainability and Challenges’.

“PwC’s freight and logistics project will collate information from a range of studies and programs conducted into land, sea and air freight industries and advise on the best path forward for practical improvements,” said McMaster. “The project will address expected future developments and identify non-infrastructure initiatives that will increase corridor capacity, reduce congestion and address sustainability and growth.

“Consultation with key stakeholders in the NSW freight and logistics sector throughout the state will be a critically important part of this project.”

The study — commissioned for a six-figure amount — is expected to be finalised around September this year.
“By embracing all of the freight handling and processing disciplines within the urban areas and the links for NSW regional centres, FALCONSW is seeking to deliver productivity enhancement, growth and sustainability amongst industry participants,” added McMaster.

Formerly the Airfreight Council of NSW, FALCONSW is an industry/government collaboration, financially supported by federal and state governments, with the primary aim to foster efficiencies within the NSW freight transport and logistics sector.

FAPAA meeting keeps the heat on CASS, with IATA urged to consult

CONTROVERSY again surrounded the IATA session at this year’s Federation of Asia Pacific Air-cargo Association’s (FAPAA) executive council meeting and agm held in Bangkok.

The subject of the IATA Cargo Accounts Settlement System (CASS) was a main issue as it continues to pose problems for the member associations of FAPAA and the company members of their countries or regions.

In the conclusion of the round table discussion, FAPAA strongly urged IATA to introduce a consistent approach to consultation with the national air cargo association when introducing CASS to any member within the region. Director IATA Cargo Services Asia-Pacific Peter Chong, who presented an e-freight update during the IATA session, accepted the position of the FAPAA members and advised: “IATA will be open to dialogue with air cargo associations”.

As well as CASS, the three-day FAPAA executive council meeting also discussed other vital issues, including security, IT and IATA e-Freight. There was also a focus on strengthening relationships with other bodies representing various aspects of the air cargo industry.

David Fielder, security advisor for FAPAA, attended the meetings to present news, issues and information from the Asia-Pacific region and global security in air freight. Fielder helped to define differences between scanning and screening within air cargo security and again advised members of the risks and alerts that need to be considered at all times in the air cargo industry.

This year, FAPAA welcomed Pakistan as a new country member. The inclusion of the Pakistan International Freight Forwarding Association (PIFFA) demonstrates growth for the FAPAA organisation. The aim is to increase membership to improve communication and to better handle issues within the Asia-Pacific.

Meanwhile, FIATA has indicated it would like to have closer co-operation with FAPAA. The Bangkok meeting was told: “We will be holding our hands together and wish to move in one direction to tackle issues globally”.

The Singapore Association of Air Cargo Agents (SAAA) will host FAPAA’s executive council meeting in 2010 in Singapore.

Glidepath boosts operations globally

GLIDEPATH has opened an office in Mumbai to support its growing business in India.  The company, which is New Zealand-based with an expanding Australian presence, is becoming a major player in cargo and airport baggage handling internationally.

It also is active in software control solutions and parcel sorting.

As reported earlier, it has won several major US contracts and has recently boosted its North American operations to leverage this success.

Glidepath has very high hopes for India.  “We have invested time to develop the market,” said Ken Stevens, company chairman and managing director.

“Our track record for reliability, innovation and service is seeing us win more contracts to upgrade, design and install integrated airport baggage handling and security systems at regional and international airports across India as the government and private operators continue to invest in the rapid modernisation of aviation infrastructure.
“There is also opportunity to provide cargo and parcel handling systems.”

Stevens said Glidepath had “a stream of new airport work under contract” in India as well as “new opportunities in the pipeline”.

The new Indian office is managed by Anoop Rawat, supported by specialist staff in sales, service and project management roles.

Glidepath’s Australian operation, headed by Rob Harvey as regional general manager for Australia and Asia, has also been enjoying a very busy year.  Among his recent projects has been installation of a new cargo handling system for Toll Dnata in Brisbane.

Other projects have included three big contracts at Sydney International Airport and work at Newcastle, Rockhampton, Mackay, Port Hedland and Newman airports, while upgrades at the Qantas domestic terminal in Perth feature a substantial amount of Glidepath equipment.

The Sydney office is also overseeing a baggage handling contract for an Indonesian regional airport, along with business growth in Indonesia, Philippines and Papua New Guinea.

On the web:  www.glidepath.co.nz

IASC calls for para 5 proposals as Heavylift, PAE vie for PNG rights

BOTH HeavyLift Cargo Airlines and Pacific Air Express are vying for the allocation of cargo capacity on the PNG route that was abandoned recently by Qantas.

Because two carriers are seeking the same limited capacity, the International Air Services Commission (IASC) has asked them to address the criteria outlined in what is known as ‘paragraph 5’.

This is part of the ministerial policy statement which sets the scene for Australian air route allocations.

It seeks quite detailed information on competition benefits, tourism benefits (not applicable in this case), consumer benefits, trade benefits, industry structure and other issues.

Sub-section 5.1(d) notes that “in assessing the extent to which applications will promote international trade, the Commission should have regard to the availability of frequent, low cost, reliable freight movement for Australian exporters and importers”

Among many points listed under competition benefits, the Commission has to look at the “prospects for lower tariffs, increased choice and frequency of service and innovative product differentiation”.

The current situation arose from QF’s May reduction in capacity, the latest step in what had been quite a saga, as we have reported.  HeavyLift Cargo Airlines applied to the IASC for the unused allocation which, if granted, would take its weekly allocation to 89 tonnes, although Michael Lee, the carrier’s director operations and commercial, said 88 tonnes would be “acceptable”.

“As you will recall, HeavyLift Cargo Airlines compromised our capacity on the route to allow Qantas to operate B737 cargo services,” Lee told the IASC’s executive director, Dilip Matthews.

“The Qantas cargo service has ceased and HeavyLift Cargo Airlines is conducting additional capacity lifts on charter.”
Current operations saw a B721C operating three days a week for a total of 66 tonnes, he said.

The envisaged capacity increase would see this upped to a B722C flying three times weekly for a total gross capacity of 78 tonnes, plus a weekly B721C hauling 11 tonnes of tuna POM-CNS.

In late 2007, the PNG freighter allocation was at the centre of a - mostly - polite stoush between HeavyLift and Qantas, with the IASC in the middle.

HeavyLift, which had in recent times been the only user of Australian freight capacity on the route, asked the IASC to lift its usage from 40 to 85 tonnes weekly.

Qantas complained, saying it intended to operate a B733F between CNS and POM twice weekly which, at 17 tonnes per aircraft meant it needed 34 tonnes per week.

HeavyLift observed that “we have secured the export trade from PNG and doubt the viable operation of a Qantas service with one-way cargo”, but also offered to cap its allocation at 66 tonnes so Qantas could have its 34 tonnes.  The total cargo allocation for Australian freighters on the PNG route is 100 tonnes weekly.

This sensible compromise was put into effect by the IASC.

In April last year, Qantas sought a variation to allow usage of aircraft from its wholly-owned subsidiary, Express Freighters Australia.  And in May this year, Qantas asked for the allocation to be reduced from 34 to 17.5 tonnes weekly.

But in the wake of the HeavyLift bid to pick up this capacity, Brisbane-based Pacific Air Express advised the IASC it wanted the full 16.5 tonnes which would be utilised on a weekly B733F service between Brisbane and Port Moresby.
PAE holds an International Air Licence (IAL) for the PNG route, together with a foreign air operator certificate issued by CAA PNG to its aircraft provider, Airwork Flight Operations.

Because of this, said managing director Gary Clifford, “we are able to commence a weekly freighter service immediately”.

He pointed out that PAE currently used a B733F on the Australia-Solomons route.  “Existing customers have indicated they have considerable freight requirements on the Australia-PNG route, which gives our company a very high level of confidence in the commercial success of the weekly service.”

Clifford also noted that giving the allocation to PAE would bring competition on the route, “which is a primary objective of the IASC’s freight capacity allocation system”.

Ignore the growing raft of regulators and regulations at your peril, says Hudson

A PARTNER in one of Australia’s major law firms has advised the air freight industry that it needs to concern itself about compliance management strategies.

Andrew Hudson of Hunt and Hunt Lawyers was addressing the Customs Brokers and Forwarders Council of Australia (CBFCA) inaugural International Trade & Logistics Symposium in Sydney.

His presentation focused on the following key areas:

• The trade sector has a broad range of regulations and a broad range of state and federal government agencies that require various levels of compliance. They include the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service, AQIS (and the new Biosecurity Agency and its new Act), the ATO, the ACCC and the various Road Traffic authorities who handle the ‘Chain of Responsibility’. The best approach was to do ‘the homework’ first and try and get it right at the outset rather than dealing with problems later. Regulators of all types rewarded those who take the time and make the effort to comply, he said.

•  Parties should not overlook the ACCC as an important regulator. While the ACCC and other international regulators have been engaged in a high profile attack on alleged price fixing by those in the air cargo industry, those operating locally need to be very careful to ensure that they too operate in accordance with all regulations, including the very new regulation on component pricing, which commenced on May 25 this year. Hudson stressed that given that the regulation had been developed over three years, ACCC expected full compliance immediately and would not tolerate those who did not make efforts to comply. All those providing services to individual consumers (or who might do so) need to ensure that they observe all the new ‘one-price’ requirements, he said.

• The CBFCA warned many years ago that the increase in the threshold for Self Assessed Clearance Declarations (SACDs) to A$1000 per consignment would create huge problems, as importers tried to bring goods in below that threshold - validly or not! While the CBFCA appreciates that it was a political decision to raise that threshold, the current close focus on SACDs suggests that the problems which were flagged have, in fact, risen in number.

• Those operating licensed premises handling goods under Customs control now need to consider the new penalty regime associated with the failure to account for goods passing through their premises. They need to review their insurances, their terms and conditions of trade, their relationships with others in their supply chain, the security of their supply chain and their procedures for handling goods that ‘appear to have been abandoned’ to try to manage the new penalties, he concluded.

Industry ‘in uncharted territory and there’s no roadmap to guide us through’ — IATA

IATA director general and chief executive Giovanni Bisignani — addressing the 65th IATA Annual General Meeting (AGM) in Kuala Lumpur — said the industry was in uncharted territory and airlines had no roadmap to follow when seeking a safe way through the current crisis.

 "There is no modern precedent for today’s economic melt-down. The ground has shifted. Our industry has been shaken. This  is the most difficult situation that the industry has faced,” he said.

 "After September 11, revenues fell by seven per cent. It took three years to recover lost ground, even on the back of a strong economy. This time we face a drop of 15 per cent — a loss of revenues of US$80 billion — in the middle of a global recession. Our future depends on a drastic reshaping by our partners, governments and industry. We cannot bear the cost of government micro regulation, crazy taxation and partners abusing their monopoly power.”
 His dramatic opening comments set the tone for the whole AGM as airlines talked about uniting to face governments on the hot topic of emissions trading. There was a strong call for airlines to consolidate operations either by merging or by convincing governments not to step in and save ailing carriers, but to allow those who were not profitable to fold.

 Bisignani then attacked those with monopolies within the aviation chain, in particular the airports. He produced his “wall of shame,”  which highlighted airports not working with their customer airlines in these times of trouble. These included:

 BAA and the UK’s CAA for London’s Heathrow increasing charges by 86 per cent.

 Delhi and Mumbai airports for their 207 per cent increases.

 Quiport in Ecuador for its 79 per cent increase.

 ATNS in South Africa for proposing a 44 per cent increase.

 Eurocontrol states of Denmark, the Netherlands and Poland for proposing charge increases of between 27-32 per cent.

 “What can I say?" Bisignani asked, and then answered with one word, “Basta”.

 He advised delegates that the bill paid to monopoly suppliers in the last year grew by US$1.5 billion. In the first six months of 2009 it grew by another US$1.5billion.

 Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce also took a swipe at the airport operators, saying: “ We find that the monopoly suppliers in particular are something the industry needs to focus on. In Australia and our region there have been significant increases in charges.”

 Robert Milton, chairman, president and chief executive of ACE Aviation Holdings compared the airlines to a cow, where everyone is getting something from it, meat, milk and so on, yet the cow itself is worth nothing.

Interview: Gabriela Ahrens

Lufthansa Cargo confident new services - including air-sea freight options and animal handling - will help it through the crisis

In the 2008 financial year, Lufthansa Cargo transported around 1.70 million tonnes of freight and mail and clocked up 8.3 billion revenue tonne-kilometres and revenues of 2.9 billion euros. The  cargo carrier serves some 300 destinations in 90 countries in a global network with its own fleet of freighters, the belly capacities of Lufthansa’s passenger aircraft and an extensive road services network.

Gabriela Ahrens is responsible for Lufthansa Cargo in South-East Asia and Australia. She was born in Steinkirchen, Germany and initially worked in tourism both in Germany and United Kingdom before joining Lufthansa German Airlines in Frankfurt in 1987. She moved to LH Cargo in 1999 as regional manager sales - Eastern China, based in Shanghai.  From 1995-1999 Ahrens worked in the passenger division of the airline.  She returned to cargo in 2001 and as regional  manager sales Hong Kong, Southern China and Taiwan based in Hong Kong. In 2005 she moved back to a passenger role as general manager Lufthansa Australia and moved to Sydney. In 2007 she moved back to cargo and was promoted to her present position as regional director for South-East Asia and Australia. She is headquartered in Singapore.

What is your role with Lufthansa Cargo?

As regional director Lufthansa Cargo South East Asia I am responsible for the development of Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand and Australia. A very interesting and challenging region with a lot of cultural differences and of course I am very happy to still take care of ‘Down Under’.

AirShip Australia, launched in difficult economic times, has now had six months to bed down. How is the new product performing?

We launched  a 'one stop' international multi-modal AirShip service from Europe to Australia in January this year, offering a high quality and reliable air and sea logistic solution.

We are using our daily direct connections into our hubs in Shenzen and Hong Kong linking to the largest Australian seaports Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. All one-stop-shopping with LH offering the complete transportation chain under one AWB, and all with the quality assurance of our services.

Considering the overall economic situation the service is doing very well. It is a more cost-effective and flexible freight option than direct airfreight with a faster transportation time than by traditional ocean-going freight and with clear advantages for our customers. Transportation time is reduced by approx 50 per cent compared to pure sea freight. Capital working costs also are much lower and it gives us expanded and flexible capacity access to further meet our customers’ supply chain needs. The sales advantage of AirShip is the cost advantage to shippers and it enables us to offer an attractive alternative to direct air freight services.

You have also expanded livestock services with the opening of an animal lounge in Frankfurt. How does that work?

Lufthansa Cargo is proud to have the world's most modern airport animal facility at Frankfurt Airport. Built on approximately 4000 square metres, it is run by experienced livestock experts. They provide for the animal 'passengers' organising care, feeding and shelter which maintain the strict hygiene and veterinary directives of the European Union.

The new animal lounge is optimally prepared for all species, whether large or small, exotic animals or family pets.
The animal lounge works on a 'fast lane' principle for export, transit and import. The animals get priority and are first on and off the aircraft.

The facility boasts a special veterinary examination area and a black-light area for tropical ornamental fish - very important for South East Asia as most of the worldwide tropical fish originate from here.

On the numbers side the facility boasts 42 large animal stalls; 18 climatic chambers for sensitive birds and exotic animals such as reptiles or insects and 39 small animal boxes - mainly for dogs and cats.

A special team of 'animal keepers'  including horse attendants, former zoo employees, vets and police dog handlers guarantee an unprecedented level of professional animal care.

The animal lounge is located in its own dedicated  special safety and hygienic  area and marks the European Union external boundary. Each employee has two lockers, one for his or her clothing inside the animal lounge and again one for the outside. This meets strict quarantine rules and guarantees the safety of the animals.

Time: Matters (TM) your special service for courier, same day and  emergency logistics seems to be coming into its own since the global financial crisis (GFC). More companies are reducing and centralising in a bid to reduce warehouse capacity.  Has this helped TM?

Time:Matters and its services, especially courier services, are needed at all times regardless of any crisis. The GFC has not helped as products in this sector are now  not in such high demand. Unfortunately TM is not immune to the downturn.

Lufthansa is also expanding its electronic channels, adding an electronic claims process. How has this been accepted by customers?

We are simplifying our processes wherever possible. This is to the clear benefit of our customers — a fast and reliable way of processing claims — and the improved efficiency has been welcomed.

What progress has Lufthansa made on ‘green’ freight initiatives?

The airline is very much involved and engaged in environmental initiatives. We are making good progress on green freight initiatives, but I am not  personally involved and have little information on the details.

You recently inked a new aviation agreement with Israel, is any other route expansion in the pipeline?

At this stage we are performing route reviews as and when appropriate and do not expect to announce any major route changes in the near future.

How is Lufthansa’s yield in Asia-Pacific? What markets do you expect to improve first?

The Global Financial Crisis I think is hitting everybody in our industry very hard. Fortunately Lufthansa Cargo management reacted quickly to the changing market dynamics and we believe that we are on the right track to get through this crisis as a winner.

Yields are very much under pressure. We are trying to keep them at a viable level. Our goal is to stay profitable with our operations. Not easy in the current environment.

However we are seeing markets stabilising and the last couple of weeks have been very good for tonnage and load factors. We hope we have reached the bottom of the trough and are on a upward trend again. Still, as mentioned before, the yields also have to stabilise to really talk about improvement.

As for which markets will improve first, we are working with industry to improve all markets where possible. The problem is the overall market is quite volatile and some markets change more stable than others and it's changing more or less on a weekly, if not daily, basis. 

Singapore and Malaysia airports have reduced fees to airlines during the GFC has this helped?

Yes and we appreciate the gesture by the airports as it helps us survive. Singapore and Malaysia and many others are very service-orientated airports and help to keep flights in the air. It is good to know that they see us as partners in business and want to help combat this tough and critical period. 

What impact has 9/11 security had on air freight?

When 9/11 happened in the US it changed the world of airfreight business almost overnight. Security measures all over the world have been drastically increased. For Lufthansa Cargo security is a top priority and measures have been taken to provide customers with the best possible security for their valuable cargo.

The US is implementing 100 per cent screening from 2010. Will Lufthansa do the screening itself and charge additionally or will you outsource the screening? 

I am not involved in the details of the screening processes in US. However we will adhere to the new requirements and whether this is outsouced or if we will do it will depend on quality and complexity. Cost also is an issue and I believe it will be done the most cost-effective way whilst maintaining maximum security.

Air France and KLM have decided to merge many of their services as well as operate joint services and reduce freight staff where it is practical. How much increased competition does this represent?

I cannot judge and comment on the actions taken by our competition. However cost and competitiveness is important to all participants in the industry and increasing productivity is an issue for all of us.

You have worked in both passenger and freight roles for Lufthansa, which do you prefer?

This is a most difficult question to answer. I love my job, but my origins are on the passenger side, and previously I never thought that I could ever do anything else. Then I had the chance to look beyond the fence and explore the air freight world within the Lufthansa Group - and I loved it. Australia was a very special experience with Lufhansa being so successful in a market we don't fly any more. With my current position as regional director - South East Asia , one big plus is that I am still responsible for Australia and with our Airship product we are now also serving Australia again on the freight side. A good feeling !

I feel fortunate that I have these great opportunities and challenges on both sides of the business, not only on the career side but also with all the cultural experiences and the beautiful people I have met over the years. 

Liquid lunch cost trader very dearly

FEBRUARY 6 last year started out as just another day for David Redmond, trading cargo and oil futures on the freight desk at Morgan Stanley’s commodities division in London.

A long liquid lunch, unfortunately, changed everything.

While not noticeably drunk, he made a series of ill-advised trades - believed to have been worth around US$10 million - that according to the Financial Services Authority, exposed Morgan Stanley “to the risk of a significant loss.
“The next day, rather than informing the firm of his actions, he traded out of the position.  Redmond only admitted concealing the position when directly challenged by the firm.”

Although the trading frenzy ended with a profit for Morgan Stanley, the company suspended and later dismissed Redmond after discovering what had happened.

While the FSA has banned Redmond “from performing any function in relation to any regulated activity on the grounds that he is not a fit and proper person” it did take into account that the trading was only over two days, there was no risk to consumers, that Redmond showed remorse and he had co-operated with the investigation.

It also appeared to have been out of character and unpremeditated, the FSA noted.  It did not add a warning about the pitfalls of taking liquid lunches.

“In the circumstances, the FSA has indicated that it is likely to agree to an application from Redmond to lift the ban after two years, provided there is no further evidence of misconduct.”

FALCONSW workshops to focus on stakeholders’ Sydney landside needs

MAJOR issues on air freight transport developments in south eastern Sydney have resulted in a series of workshops being planned to consider industry stakeholder’s priorities when addressing deficiencies in landside infrastructure.

The move was initiated at an executive committee meeting of the Freight and Logistics Council of New South Wales (FALCONSW) in Sydney, when hearing progress on a study it commissioned into 2lst century freight transport.

The main thrust of this study by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) is to consider what practical solutions could improve the efficiency of the air and sea supply chains around Botany Bay and Sydney International airport.

“The first of these workshops was held on July 14 in Newcastle, where FALCONSW and PwC collaborated with the Hunter Business Chamber and the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport,” said Hugh McMaster, acting executive officer of FALCONSW. “The workshop discussed the needs of the freight and logistics sector and its customers in the Central Coast/Hunter regions over the short (two-year), medium (five-year) and long (10-year) terms. “This includes the role of Williamtown airport as a regional freight hub.

“Other workshops are planned for Sydney and regional New South Wales in coming weeks. Members of the business community, including the freight and logistics sector that have an interest in the development of a better freight infrastructure network or improved network access in the Hunter/Central Coast region of NSW are encouraged to attend the workshop,” said McMaster.

He said FALCONSW had commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers to develop “a practical road map for efficiency improvements in the New South Wales freight and logistics sector”.

PwC would conduct the review of the state’s key freight supply chains under the title of ‘Actions for NSW Freight and Logistics Industry Efficiencies and 21st Century Sustainability and Challenges’.

“PwC’s freight and logistics project will collate information from a range of studies and programs conducted into land, sea and air freight industries and advise on the best path forward for practical improvements,” said McMaster. “The project will address expected future developments and identify non-infrastructure initiatives that will increase corridor capacity, reduce congestion and address sustainability and growth.

“Consultation with key stakeholders in the NSW freight and logistics sector throughout the state will be a critically important part of this project.”

The study — commissioned for a six-figure amount — is expected to be finalised around September this year.
“By embracing all of the freight handling and processing disciplines within the urban areas and the links for NSW regional centres, FALCONSW is seeking to deliver productivity enhancement, growth and sustainability amongst industry participants,” added McMaster.

Formerly the Airfreight Council of NSW, FALCONSW is an industry/government collaboration, financially supported by federal and state governments, with the primary aim to foster efficiencies within the NSW freight transport and logistics sector.

FAPAA meeting keeps the heat on CASS, with IATA urged to consult

CONTROVERSY again surrounded the IATA session at this year’s Federation of Asia Pacific Air-cargo Association’s (FAPAA) executive council meeting and agm held in Bangkok.

The subject of the IATA Cargo Accounts Settlement System (CASS) was a main issue as it continues to pose problems for the member associations of FAPAA and the company members of their countries or regions.

In the conclusion of the round table discussion, FAPAA strongly urged IATA to introduce a consistent approach to consultation with the national air cargo association when introducing CASS to any member within the region. Director IATA Cargo Services Asia-Pacific Peter Chong, who presented an e-freight update during the IATA session, accepted the position of the FAPAA members and advised: “IATA will be open to dialogue with air cargo associations”.

As well as CASS, the three-day FAPAA executive council meeting also discussed other vital issues, including security, IT and IATA e-Freight. There was also a focus on strengthening relationships with other bodies representing various aspects of the air cargo industry.

David Fielder, security advisor for FAPAA, attended the meetings to present news, issues and information from the Asia-Pacific region and global security in air freight. Fielder helped to define differences between scanning and screening within air cargo security and again advised members of the risks and alerts that need to be considered at all times in the air cargo industry.

This year, FAPAA welcomed Pakistan as a new country member. The inclusion of the Pakistan International Freight Forwarding Association (PIFFA) demonstrates growth for the FAPAA organisation. The aim is to increase membership to improve communication and to better handle issues within the Asia-Pacific.

Meanwhile, FIATA has indicated it would like to have closer co-operation with FAPAA. The Bangkok meeting was told: “We will be holding our hands together and wish to move in one direction to tackle issues globally”.

The Singapore Association of Air Cargo Agents (SAAA) will host FAPAA’s executive council meeting in 2010 in Singapore.

Glidepath boosts operations globally

GLIDEPATH has opened an office in Mumbai to support its growing business in India.  The company, which is New Zealand-based with an expanding Australian presence, is becoming a major player in cargo and airport baggage handling internationally.

It also is active in software control solutions and parcel sorting.

As reported earlier, it has won several major US contracts and has recently boosted its North American operations to leverage this success.

Glidepath has very high hopes for India.  “We have invested time to develop the market,” said Ken Stevens, company chairman and managing director.

“Our track record for reliability, innovation and service is seeing us win more contracts to upgrade, design and install integrated airport baggage handling and security systems at regional and international airports across India as the government and private operators continue to invest in the rapid modernisation of aviation infrastructure.
“There is also opportunity to provide cargo and parcel handling systems.”

Stevens said Glidepath had “a stream of new airport work under contract” in India as well as “new opportunities in the pipeline”.

The new Indian office is managed by Anoop Rawat, supported by specialist staff in sales, service and project management roles.

Glidepath’s Australian operation, headed by Rob Harvey as regional general manager for Australia and Asia, has also been enjoying a very busy year.  Among his recent projects has been installation of a new cargo handling system for Toll Dnata in Brisbane.

Other projects have included three big contracts at Sydney International Airport and work at Newcastle, Rockhampton, Mackay, Port Hedland and Newman airports, while upgrades at the Qantas domestic terminal in Perth feature a substantial amount of Glidepath equipment.

The Sydney office is also overseeing a baggage handling contract for an Indonesian regional airport, along with business growth in Indonesia, Philippines and Papua New Guinea.

On the web:  www.glidepath.co.nz

IASC calls for para 5 proposals as Heavylift, PAE vie for PNG rights

BOTH HeavyLift Cargo Airlines and Pacific Air Express are vying for the allocation of cargo capacity on the PNG route that was abandoned recently by Qantas.

Because two carriers are seeking the same limited capacity, the International Air Services Commission (IASC) has asked them to address the criteria outlined in what is known as ‘paragraph 5’.

This is part of the ministerial policy statement which sets the scene for Australian air route allocations.

It seeks quite detailed information on competition benefits, tourism benefits (not applicable in this case), consumer benefits, trade benefits, industry structure and other issues.

Sub-section 5.1(d) notes that “in assessing the extent to which applications will promote international trade, the Commission should have regard to the availability of frequent, low cost, reliable freight movement for Australian exporters and importers”

Among many points listed under competition benefits, the Commission has to look at the “prospects for lower tariffs, increased choice and frequency of service and innovative product differentiation”.

The current situation arose from QF’s May reduction in capacity, the latest step in what had been quite a saga, as we have reported.  HeavyLift Cargo Airlines applied to the IASC for the unused allocation which, if granted, would take its weekly allocation to 89 tonnes, although Michael Lee, the carrier’s director operations and commercial, said 88 tonnes would be “acceptable”.

“As you will recall, HeavyLift Cargo Airlines compromised our capacity on the route to allow Qantas to operate B737 cargo services,” Lee told the IASC’s executive director, Dilip Matthews.

“The Qantas cargo service has ceased and HeavyLift Cargo Airlines is conducting additional capacity lifts on charter.”
Current operations saw a B721C operating three days a week for a total of 66 tonnes, he said.

The envisaged capacity increase would see this upped to a B722C flying three times weekly for a total gross capacity of 78 tonnes, plus a weekly B721C hauling 11 tonnes of tuna POM-CNS.

In late 2007, the PNG freighter allocation was at the centre of a - mostly - polite stoush between HeavyLift and Qantas, with the IASC in the middle.

HeavyLift, which had in recent times been the only user of Australian freight capacity on the route, asked the IASC to lift its usage from 40 to 85 tonnes weekly.

Qantas complained, saying it intended to operate a B733F between CNS and POM twice weekly which, at 17 tonnes per aircraft meant it needed 34 tonnes per week.

HeavyLift observed that “we have secured the export trade from PNG and doubt the viable operation of a Qantas service with one-way cargo”, but also offered to cap its allocation at 66 tonnes so Qantas could have its 34 tonnes.  The total cargo allocation for Australian freighters on the PNG route is 100 tonnes weekly.

This sensible compromise was put into effect by the IASC.

In April last year, Qantas sought a variation to allow usage of aircraft from its wholly-owned subsidiary, Express Freighters Australia.  And in May this year, Qantas asked for the allocation to be reduced from 34 to 17.5 tonnes weekly.

But in the wake of the HeavyLift bid to pick up this capacity, Brisbane-based Pacific Air Express advised the IASC it wanted the full 16.5 tonnes which would be utilised on a weekly B733F service between Brisbane and Port Moresby.
PAE holds an International Air Licence (IAL) for the PNG route, together with a foreign air operator certificate issued by CAA PNG to its aircraft provider, Airwork Flight Operations.

Because of this, said managing director Gary Clifford, “we are able to commence a weekly freighter service immediately”.

He pointed out that PAE currently used a B733F on the Australia-Solomons route.  “Existing customers have indicated they have considerable freight requirements on the Australia-PNG route, which gives our company a very high level of confidence in the commercial success of the weekly service.”

Clifford also noted that giving the allocation to PAE would bring competition on the route, “which is a primary objective of the IASC’s freight capacity allocation system”.

Ignore the growing raft of regulators and regulations at your peril, says Hudson

A PARTNER in one of Australia’s major law firms has advised the air freight industry that it needs to concern itself about compliance management strategies.

Andrew Hudson of Hunt and Hunt Lawyers was addressing the Customs Brokers and Forwarders Council of Australia (CBFCA) inaugural International Trade & Logistics Symposium in Sydney.

His presentation focused on the following key areas:

• The trade sector has a broad range of regulations and a broad range of state and federal government agencies that require various levels of compliance. They include the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service, AQIS (and the new Biosecurity Agency and its new Act), the ATO, the ACCC and the various Road Traffic authorities who handle the ‘Chain of Responsibility’. The best approach was to do ‘the homework’ first and try and get it right at the outset rather than dealing with problems later. Regulators of all types rewarded those who take the time and make the effort to comply, he said.

•  Parties should not overlook the ACCC as an important regulator. While the ACCC and other international regulators have been engaged in a high profile attack on alleged price fixing by those in the air cargo industry, those operating locally need to be very careful to ensure that they too operate in accordance with all regulations, including the very new regulation on component pricing, which commenced on May 25 this year. Hudson stressed that given that the regulation had been developed over three years, ACCC expected full compliance immediately and would not tolerate those who did not make efforts to comply. All those providing services to individual consumers (or who might do so) need to ensure that they observe all the new ‘one-price’ requirements, he said.

• The CBFCA warned many years ago that the increase in the threshold for Self Assessed Clearance Declarations (SACDs) to A$1000 per consignment would create huge problems, as importers tried to bring goods in below that threshold - validly or not! While the CBFCA appreciates that it was a political decision to raise that threshold, the current close focus on SACDs suggests that the problems which were flagged have, in fact, risen in number.

• Those operating licensed premises handling goods under Customs control now need to consider the new penalty regime associated with the failure to account for goods passing through their premises. They need to review their insurances, their terms and conditions of trade, their relationships with others in their supply chain, the security of their supply chain and their procedures for handling goods that ‘appear to have been abandoned’ to try to manage the new penalties, he concluded.

Industry ‘in uncharted territory and there’s no roadmap to guide us through’ — IATA

IATA director general and chief executive Giovanni Bisignani — addressing the 65th IATA Annual General Meeting (AGM) in Kuala Lumpur — said the industry was in uncharted territory and airlines had no roadmap to follow when seeking a safe way through the current crisis.

 "There is no modern precedent for today’s economic melt-down. The ground has shifted. Our industry has been shaken. This  is the most difficult situation that the industry has faced,” he said.

 "After September 11, revenues fell by seven per cent. It took three years to recover lost ground, even on the back of a strong economy. This time we face a drop of 15 per cent — a loss of revenues of US$80 billion — in the middle of a global recession. Our future depends on a drastic reshaping by our partners, governments and industry. We cannot bear the cost of government micro regulation, crazy taxation and partners abusing their monopoly power.”
 His dramatic opening comments set the tone for the whole AGM as airlines talked about uniting to face governments on the hot topic of emissions trading. There was a strong call for airlines to consolidate operations either by merging or by convincing governments not to step in and save ailing carriers, but to allow those who were not profitable to fold.

 Bisignani then attacked those with monopolies within the aviation chain, in particular the airports. He produced his “wall of shame,”  which highlighted airports not working with their customer airlines in these times of trouble. These included:

 BAA and the UK’s CAA for London’s Heathrow increasing charges by 86 per cent.

 Delhi and Mumbai airports for their 207 per cent increases.

 Quiport in Ecuador for its 79 per cent increase.

 ATNS in South Africa for proposing a 44 per cent increase.

 Eurocontrol states of Denmark, the Netherlands and Poland for proposing charge increases of between 27-32 per cent.

 “What can I say?" Bisignani asked, and then answered with one word, “Basta”.

 He advised delegates that the bill paid to monopoly suppliers in the last year grew by US$1.5 billion. In the first six months of 2009 it grew by another US$1.5billion.

 Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce also took a swipe at the airport operators, saying: “ We find that the monopoly suppliers in particular are something the industry needs to focus on. In Australia and our region there have been significant increases in charges.”

 Robert Milton, chairman, president and chief executive of ACE Aviation Holdings compared the airlines to a cow, where everyone is getting something from it, meat, milk and so on, yet the cow itself is worth nothing.

Interview: Gabriela Ahrens

Lufthansa Cargo confident new services - including air-sea freight options and animal handling - will help it through the crisis

In the 2008 financial year, Lufthansa Cargo transported around 1.70 million tonnes of freight and mail and clocked up 8.3 billion revenue tonne-kilometres and revenues of 2.9 billion euros. The  cargo carrier serves some 300 destinations in 90 countries in a global network with its own fleet of freighters, the belly capacities of Lufthansa’s passenger aircraft and an extensive road services network.

Gabriela Ahrens is responsible for Lufthansa Cargo in South-East Asia and Australia. She was born in Steinkirchen, Germany and initially worked in tourism both in Germany and United Kingdom before joining Lufthansa German Airlines in Frankfurt in 1987. She moved to LH Cargo in 1999 as regional manager sales - Eastern China, based in Shanghai.  From 1995-1999 Ahrens worked in the passenger division of the airline.  She returned to cargo in 2001 and as regional  manager sales Hong Kong, Southern China and Taiwan based in Hong Kong. In 2005 she moved back to a passenger role as general manager Lufthansa Australia and moved to Sydney. In 2007 she moved back to cargo and was promoted to her present position as regional director for South-East Asia and Australia. She is headquartered in Singapore.

What is your role with Lufthansa Cargo?

As regional director Lufthansa Cargo South East Asia I am responsible for the development of Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand and Australia. A very interesting and challenging region with a lot of cultural differences and of course I am very happy to still take care of ‘Down Under’.

AirShip Australia, launched in difficult economic times, has now had six months to bed down. How is the new product performing?

We launched  a 'one stop' international multi-modal AirShip service from Europe to Australia in January this year, offering a high quality and reliable air and sea logistic solution.

We are using our daily direct connections into our hubs in Shenzen and Hong Kong linking to the largest Australian seaports Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. All one-stop-shopping with LH offering the complete transportation chain under one AWB, and all with the quality assurance of our services.

Considering the overall economic situation the service is doing very well. It is a more cost-effective and flexible freight option than direct airfreight with a faster transportation time than by traditional ocean-going freight and with clear advantages for our customers. Transportation time is reduced by approx 50 per cent compared to pure sea freight. Capital working costs also are much lower and it gives us expanded and flexible capacity access to further meet our customers’ supply chain needs. The sales advantage of AirShip is the cost advantage to shippers and it enables us to offer an attractive alternative to direct air freight services.

You have also expanded livestock services with the opening of an animal lounge in Frankfurt. How does that work?

Lufthansa Cargo is proud to have the world's most modern airport animal facility at Frankfurt Airport. Built on approximately 4000 square metres, it is run by experienced livestock experts. They provide for the animal 'passengers' organising care, feeding and shelter which maintain the strict hygiene and veterinary directives of the European Union.

The new animal lounge is optimally prepared for all species, whether large or small, exotic animals or family pets.
The animal lounge works on a 'fast lane' principle for export, transit and import. The animals get priority and are first on and off the aircraft.

The facility boasts a special veterinary examination area and a black-light area for tropical ornamental fish - very important for South East Asia as most of the worldwide tropical fish originate from here.

On the numbers side the facility boasts 42 large animal stalls; 18 climatic chambers for sensitive birds and exotic animals such as reptiles or insects and 39 small animal boxes - mainly for dogs and cats.

A special team of 'animal keepers'  including horse attendants, former zoo employees, vets and police dog handlers guarantee an unprecedented level of professional animal care.

The animal lounge is located in its own dedicated  special safety and hygienic  area and marks the European Union external boundary. Each employee has two lockers, one for his or her clothing inside the animal lounge and again one for the outside. This meets strict quarantine rules and guarantees the safety of the animals.

Time: Matters (TM) your special service for courier, same day and  emergency logistics seems to be coming into its own since the global financial crisis (GFC). More companies are reducing and centralising in a bid to reduce warehouse capacity.  Has this helped TM?

Time:Matters and its services, especially courier services, are needed at all times regardless of any crisis. The GFC has not helped as products in this sector are now  not in such high demand. Unfortunately TM is not immune to the downturn.

Lufthansa is also expanding its electronic channels, adding an electronic claims process. How has this been accepted by customers?

We are simplifying our processes wherever possible. This is to the clear benefit of our customers — a fast and reliable way of processing claims — and the improved efficiency has been welcomed.

What progress has Lufthansa made on ‘green’ freight initiatives?

The airline is very much involved and engaged in environmental initiatives. We are making good progress on green freight initiatives, but I am not  personally involved and have little information on the details.

You recently inked a new aviation agreement with Israel, is any other route expansion in the pipeline?

At this stage we are performing route reviews as and when appropriate and do not expect to announce any major route changes in the near future.

How is Lufthansa’s yield in Asia-Pacific? What markets do you expect to improve first?

The Global Financial Crisis I think is hitting everybody in our industry very hard. Fortunately Lufthansa Cargo management reacted quickly to the changing market dynamics and we believe that we are on the right track to get through this crisis as a winner.

Yields are very much under pressure. We are trying to keep them at a viable level. Our goal is to stay profitable with our operations. Not easy in the current environment.

However we are seeing markets stabilising and the last couple of weeks have been very good for tonnage and load factors. We hope we have reached the bottom of the trough and are on a upward trend again. Still, as mentioned before, the yields also have to stabilise to really talk about improvement.

As for which markets will improve first, we are working with industry to improve all markets where possible. The problem is the overall market is quite volatile and some markets change more stable than others and it's changing more or less on a weekly, if not daily, basis. 

Singapore and Malaysia airports have reduced fees to airlines during the GFC has this helped?

Yes and we appreciate the gesture by the airports as it helps us survive. Singapore and Malaysia and many others are very service-orientated airports and help to keep flights in the air. It is good to know that they see us as partners in business and want to help combat this tough and critical period. 

What impact has 9/11 security had on air freight?

When 9/11 happened in the US it changed the world of airfreight business almost overnight. Security measures all over the world have been drastically increased. For Lufthansa Cargo security is a top priority and measures have been taken to provide customers with the best possible security for their valuable cargo.

The US is implementing 100 per cent screening from 2010. Will Lufthansa do the screening itself and charge additionally or will you outsource the screening? 

I am not involved in the details of the screening processes in US. However we will adhere to the new requirements and whether this is outsouced or if we will do it will depend on quality and complexity. Cost also is an issue and I believe it will be done the most cost-effective way whilst maintaining maximum security.

Air France and KLM have decided to merge many of their services as well as operate joint services and reduce freight staff where it is practical. How much increased competition does this represent?

I cannot judge and comment on the actions taken by our competition. However cost and competitiveness is important to all participants in the industry and increasing productivity is an issue for all of us.

You have worked in both passenger and freight roles for Lufthansa, which do you prefer?

This is a most difficult question to answer. I love my job, but my origins are on the passenger side, and previously I never thought that I could ever do anything else. Then I had the chance to look beyond the fence and explore the air freight world within the Lufthansa Group - and I loved it. Australia was a very special experience with Lufhansa being so successful in a market we don't fly any more. With my current position as regional director - South East Asia , one big plus is that I am still responsible for Australia and with our Airship product we are now also serving Australia again on the freight side. A good feeling !

I feel fortunate that I have these great opportunities and challenges on both sides of the business, not only on the career side but also with all the cultural experiences and the beautiful people I have met over the years. 

Liquid lunch cost trader very dearly

FEBRUARY 6 last year started out as just another day for David Redmond, trading cargo and oil futures on the freight desk at Morgan Stanley’s commodities division in London.

A long liquid lunch, unfortunately, changed everything.

While not noticeably drunk, he made a series of ill-advised trades - believed to have been worth around US$10 million - that according to the Financial Services Authority, exposed Morgan Stanley “to the risk of a significant loss.
“The next day, rather than informing the firm of his actions, he traded out of the position.  Redmond only admitted concealing the position when directly challenged by the firm.”

Although the trading frenzy ended with a profit for Morgan Stanley, the company suspended and later dismissed Redmond after discovering what had happened.

While the FSA has banned Redmond “from performing any function in relation to any regulated activity on the grounds that he is not a fit and proper person” it did take into account that the trading was only over two days, there was no risk to consumers, that Redmond showed remorse and he had co-operated with the investigation.

It also appeared to have been out of character and unpremeditated, the FSA noted.  It did not add a warning about the pitfalls of taking liquid lunches.

“In the circumstances, the FSA has indicated that it is likely to agree to an application from Redmond to lift the ban after two years, provided there is no further evidence of misconduct.”