India-Australia study finds 10 areas suitable for trade

A report commissioned by the Federal Government to ‘unlock’ the potential for trade with India has identified 10 sectors where Australia’s advantages match India’s needs and 10 states in India where Australian traders could best focus their efforts.

Key recommendations for these sectors and markets are detailed in the report.

Titled An India Economic Strategy to 2035: Navigating from Potential to Delivery, it was researched and written by Peter Varghese AO, chancellor of the University of Queensland and former secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

A copy can be found at indiaeconomicstrategy.dfat.gov.au.

The brief instructed Varghese to look beyond the immediate horizon and provide a roadmap for unlocking the opportunities that would help India and Australia grow together.

It is been described as being about cementing India in as a priority economic partner.

Australia has enjoyed 27 years of consecutive annual economic growth, but government policy – and common sense – is to continue seeking out new markets and opportunity.

This strategy is directly aligned with the continuing well-being of international air cargo and the Australian transport and logistics sector.

The report judges that no single market over the next 20 years will offer more growth opportunities for Australia than India. By 2035, India will overtake China as the world’s most populous country. It also is poised to become the third-largest economy after China and the United States.

India’s scale alone encourages ambition, but it is the is the complementary areas between Australia’s and India’s economies that will determine success.

The foundations for an enhanced economic partnership with India are strong, underpinned by people-to-people ties and shared values.

The Government is now consulting with Australian and Indian stakeholders on how best to progress the report’s recommendations.

The report identifies 10 sectors where Australia’s competitive advantages match India’s needs, and 10 states in India where Australia should focus efforts. Key recommendations for these sectors and markets are detailed in the report.

The Government will consider its response to Varghese’s report following consultation with Australian and Indian stakeholders.

The Foreign Policy White Paper places India in the front rank of Australia’s international partnerships, recognising converging strategic interests. Implementation of the report’s findings will give similar priority to the economic dimension of the relationship.

A copy of the report can be found at indiaeconomicstrategy.dfat.gov.au.

Sydney Gateway has its benefits, but it misses opportunities to help freight industry cope with its growth - AFIF

Australia’s New South Wales government has released plans for Sydney Gateway, a new toll-free motorway connection between the new M5 interchange at St Peters and the airport that will cut travel times from Parramatta to Sydney Airport by up to 40 minutes and from Campbelltown to Sydney Airport by up to 20 minutes.

The Sydney Gateway will also include:

  Relocation and reconfiguration of Airport Drive, connecting to the International Terminal.

  Major upgrades to Qantas Drive and Joyce Drive around the Domestic Terminal, including a redesigned intersection into the Terminal.

• Duplication of the Port Botany freight rail line, to increase freight rail capacity to Australia’s largest container port.

The new toll free M12 motorway will service Western Sydney Airport at Badgerys Creek.

Sydney Gateway will be subject to comprehensive environmental assessment to secure planning approvals, with the community invited to provide feedback at key stages.

The NSW government says it will work closely with Sydney Airport Corporation, the Australian Rail Track Corporation and other key stakeholders to progress Sydney Gateway and minimise impacts on the community during delivery.

Subject to planning approvals, the road components of Sydney Gateway are expected to be complete in 2023, with an estimated cost between A$2.2 and A$2.6 billion.

However, the Sydney Gateway project is welcome but does not go far enough to reduce heavy container freight truck volumes, according to the Australian Federation of International Forwarders (AFIF).

Brian Lovell, chief executive of AFIF says more needs to be done to alleviate worsening traffic bottlenecks that could impact Australia’s key import /export trading sector.

  “AFIF supports infrastructure development to improve traffic flows and reduce congestion around the airport and port freight precincts. However, this project does little to serve the best interests of the road and air freight industry,” said Lovell.

“The Port Botany Rail Duplication is long overdue and will assist with the flow of containers by rail to and from Port Botany.

But: “The Sydney Gateway road extension stops at the domestic passenger terminal and does not connect to Port Botany, so the truck congestion around the local roads in the Mascot and Botany port precinct will continue to grow - especially during the construction phase until 2023.

“Widening Joyce Drive to three lanes each way and replacing the rail level-crossing at General Holmes Drive with a new railway underpass at Wentworth Avenue will assist road traffic flow to the airport, however Foreshore Drive and Botany Road will continue to carry heavy container truck volumes into the future.

“Sydney Airport Corp’s granting of an easement to the NSW Government on the Northern Lands area for A$170 million, to enable Sydney Gateway to be built there, effectively removes another location for the CTOs to develop their on-airport operations.

“It appears the priorities of the road and air freight industry are bypassed in the planning process, again,” Lovell concluded.

‘Pathways to the future’ theme well-supported at CBAFF meet

THIS year’s annual conference of Customs Brokers and Freight Forwarders Federation of NZ www.cbaff.org.nz continued the organisation’s well-supported policy of looking more to the practical than the philosophical, aiming its program at having members learn, benefit directly and get involved through workshops and networking.

Its theme of ‘Pathways to the future’ underlined this approach, with the pathways suggesting ‘innovation, investment and infrastructure’.

An appropriate keynote speaker for the theme was well-known Australian industry executive and CBFCA stalwart Sue Danks, representing BorderWise, which she helped set up with WiseTech Global.

She spoke of the need to continually invest in innovations in technology for border clearance and compliance, pointing to the services provided by BorderWise and WiseTech Global’s huge commitment to research and development projects.

While compliance was an increasing challenge, she said, technology was making it possible to focus on quality and achieve faster transactions.

Not changing is Glenn Coldham of DHL Global Forwarding, who continues to enjoy the confidence of CBAFF members and was re-elected for a fourth term as president. 

Vice presidents are Steve Pugh of GVI Logistics and Chris Edwards of GO Logistics.

This year’s conference, held in Nelson, was the 22nd for CBAFF www.cbaff.org.nz

TAPA publishes all three PSR documents, says many sites  could qualify for Level Three

THE TRANSPORTED Asset Protection Association’s (TAPA’s) commitment to identify and encourage a network of secure parking places for trucks across Europe has taken further significant steps forward.

TAPA has published all three levels of its Parking Security Requirements (PSR) certification program for industry review and the signing of an MoU with Snap Account, the cashless payment system for the haulage industry, which works with more than 3,000 transport operators.

TAPA has also reiterated its strongly-held belief that there are hundreds of professional parking sites in Europe that can already meet its self-certification PSR Level Three, a free-of-charge certification for Parking Place Operators (PPOs) which is available now. The need to protect drivers, their cargo and trucks is increasing demand for more safe and secure parking locations. TAPA is already seeing demand for controlled parking locations outweighing availability on key routes and says PPOs that do meet the TAPA security standard will find a ready-made market of potential customers.

Cargo loss data for 2017 produced by TAPA’s Incident Information Service (IIS) revealed an 89.9 per cent year-on-year rise in the number of freight thefts which occurred when trucks were parked in unsecured parking locations, mostly due to the lack of secure parking options. The over 2,000 such cargo crimes last year also accounted for the majority of the EUR105 million of products stolen from supply chains in the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region.

TAPA is on course to launch the higher Levels 1 and 2 of its Parking Security Requirements as planned later this year following the latest stage of consultation with its Manufacturer and Logistics Service Provider members, who have been asked to review the standards to confirm they are fit for purpose. As well as addressing the critical issue of security, PSR also recognises the importance for sites to provide suitable driver facilities, which remains an important factor for drivers with the ability to choose where they park.

TAPA, which describes its PSR as ‘practical and realistic’ has also launched a new membership category for Parking Place Operators (PPO) to increase their engagement with customers, and extended its Security Service Provider membership to include Parking Booking Platform Operators.

Its secure parking program has been boosted by the signing of an MoU with Snap Account, which completes over one million transactions a year for transport companies.

Interview: Virgin Atlantic to stay focused on strengths as it moves to implement new three-way jv

DOMINIC Kennedy was appointed managing director of Virgin Atlantic Cargo in August 2017, bringing a wealth of cargo knowledge and experience to the role as a key member of the airline’s cargo leadership team since 2008.

In his previous post of director, Commercial Planning, Dominic was responsible for the commercial planning of Virgin Atlantic’s cargo division, leading its commercial activities to achieve agreed targets and standards for financial and trading performance as well as service quality.

This role incorporated functional responsibility for revenue management, capacity control, pricing, commercial insight, revenue integrity and joint venture activities - helping the airline to maximise the business potential of its global network.

Dominic joined Virgin Atlantic in March 2005 in the airline’s Fleet and Network planning team, providing revenue analysis on all business propositions affecting Virgin Atlantic’s capacity and revenue, including aircraft acquisition, new route studies, configuration changes and product investment.

He moved to the airline’s Cargo division in 2008 to create and manage a centralised Price and Product team to focus on all aspects of pricing as well as management of internal and external incentive programs, the development of sales intelligence capabilities, commercial contracting, product strategy and interline agreements.

In November 2010, he was given responsibility for Virgin Atlantic Cargo’s Revenue Management and Capacity Control function, accountable for optimising the return on its global cargo capacity. This included route management, capacity control, operational research and ULD control.

In this interview, Kennedy explains his global vision and priorities for the airline and the greater role digitisation is playing in cargo logistics.

 

You’ve been in your role for nearly 12 months. How has it gone and what are your priorities?

Dominic Kennedy: We had a great year in 2017 which saw our volumes grow six per cent to a five-year high and our revenues increase nine per cent year-on-year. 

We’ve seen a continuation of that growth in 2018 and although we set a fairly ambitious target for this year, our latest figures show we’re on track to achieve our goal.

More recently, we’ve seen a slight softening of the ex-UK market versus last year but this was expected given the change in sterling/dollar exchange rates year-on-year. Our business overall from the UK still remains very strong, we’re starting to see more demand for our capacity out of the US, and we’re also getting a positive contribution from the rest of our network serving other important cargo markets including China, India, South Africa, Nigeria and of course Australia.

In terms of priorities, we have three clear areas of focus:  Greater simplicity to make Virgin Atlantic easier to do business with; digitisation through new technologies – our hope is to offer full self-service capability during 2019 and leveraging our partnerships with Delta and Virgin Australia.

In terms of those priorities, where are you today?

We are making some very positive progress. We see some clear linkages between simplicity and digitisation, using new and emerging technologies to drive benefit for our customers when they do business with Virgin Atlantic Cargo. But simplicity is also about us looking at every aspect of our business, to ensure that at all our touch points, we are delivering our product as efficiently as possible.

One clear objective we have is to develop a self-service platform that will enable customers to interact with us in a different way. This will be driven by a recently-advertised role that I introduced to our leadership team, ‘head of Digital and Distribution’, and I expect to make this appointment very soon. It’s a challenge and an opportunity but technology and how we can better-embrace innovation is very exciting in terms of the ability to remove paper, modernise and automate warehouses and deliver self-service for our customers.

If you look at the way the air cargo industry works today, there is so much we can work on together. I think as an industry we’ve seen some positive initial steps in terms of taking paper out of the equation but you only have to walk through a warehouse operation to see how far we still need to go. I have no doubt that new technology will help us further enhance our operational capability.

As consumers, we can all see how the world is changing because we live in an online society where everything moves faster and we have visibility of our purchases from the moment we place an order until the point of delivery.  I want our customers to have the option of being able to do everything they do today through telephone and email via a digital platform: Requesting pricing, creating waybills, ordering AWB stock, accounting, tracking, raising queries.

We’ve got lots of great ideas and now our focus is on working with our partners, handling agents and a soon-to-be-announced technology provider to ensure we can deliver a seamless experience for our customers.

This will also support the business in terms of leveraging our partnerships. As we more closely align with our JV partner, Delta Cargo, we are excited by the shared journey we are embarking upon. I’ve had customers tell me they love working with Virgin but they wish we were the size of Delta. Customers increasingly are demanding scale and reach, and partnering with Delta gives us and our customers much more choice than before. We’re into the implementation stage of our Winning Together strategy with Delta, and we’re learning a lot from each other. We’re excited about our teams coming together and collectively pooling ideas and experiences. This is certainly helped by the fact that our JV partner is also a shareholder so has a clear interest in the success of Virgin Atlantic. The main thing is that we want to build a JV that offers clear and meaningful benefits for our customers but which still enables them to express their airline of choice to work with.

You’ve worked with Virgin Australia for a long time. How is that relationship performing?

It will be 10 years in 2019. We really enjoy working with the Virgin Australia Cargo team and supporting the airline’s long-haul international route expansion. Its services from Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne to Los Angeles are well established and the launch of Melbourne-Hong Kong and now Sydney-Hong Kong have added a very positive new dimension. Customers in Asia and Australia are extremely positive about additional capacity on such prime routes to and from Greater China. The e-commerce market in the region alone is among the fastest-growing in the world.

Our team in Australia are especially happy to be marketing Sydney-Hong Kong again. It’s a route we know well, having operated it ourselves until mid-2014, so we’re expecting it to get off to a very positive start. 

IATA says international airfreight market growth is slowing after customer stock levels largely were replenished in Q1.  Do you see room for strong growth in 2018-19?

Absolutely. Our pharma product is going from strength to strength, we are being inundated with two-pallet car bookings, the perishable season relies on speed to market and our reliability for offering a simple but effective service will put us in a strong position for this year and next.

Brexit keeps dragging on, with sceptics concerned about trucking delays at ferry terminals and the issue of the Irish border. Is there a bright side to Brexit for VA Cargo or is it all ‘wait and see’?

We are actively engaged in a number of external groups and industry bodies to understand the implications of Brexit, the risks and opportunities, and trying to ensure the UK government hears the voice of the cargo industry. We meet regularly with the Department for Transport and will continue to do so as the government sets out its plans.

We want to see positive progress as quickly as possible, and  we will explore any opportunities that emerge from the final deal.   The frictionless movement of goods between the UK and EU is essential, as a significant proportion of air freight arrives from the EU by road, rail, or sea, before boarding our aircraft.  We need to ensure that goods can continue to flow seamlessly across borders as they do today.          

What is Virgin Atlantic Cargo’s take on blockchain? Are you going to adopt it in any way?

I’m excited by the potential of blockchain but we still have a lot to do and learn. We are actively exploring how blockchain can support our digital ambitions and the modernisation of our business. A secure ledger that removes paper from the point a purchase order is raised through to the receipt of goods by the consumer, for example, will represent a big step forward.

Virgin Atlantic has enjoyed success with specialist cargo programs such as pharma and high value freight. Other airlines seem focused on the same segments – are you diversifying and targeting any other potentially-lucrative verticals?

Pharma is a real success story for us. Our volumes in the first five months of 2018 were around 50 per cent higher year-on-year and we’re building a very solid reputation. The opening of our Pharma Zone with Delta Cargo at Heathrow in October 2017 was a sign of our intent and we’ve now confirmed our GDP compliance for both the Pharma Zone and our global headquarters.  We expect our best-ever year for pharma in this fast-growing, very specialist and highly-regulated part of the air cargo market.

We’re also seeing the benefit of being a big player on the transatlantic market, which is the world’s biggest pharma trade lane. Alongside our JV partner, Delta Cargo, we now offer around a quarter of all transatlantic cargo capacity. We’re also seeing our pharma volumes increase on our China and India routes. Similarly, our network is ideal to support the growth of e-commerce volumes, again to and from the US as well as major markets in China and Australia, the latter through our partnership with Virgin Australia.

Moving high value cargo has been a specialisation of ours for a long time, including two-pallet prestige car shipments. Overall, we remain committed to selling a simple product portfolio, one that’s easy to understand and delivers what we promise. That’s what our customers tell us they want and it is going to give us the best financial return.        

There have been recent reports claiming pharma airfreight consignments are prone to mishandling, leading to high losses for those customers. Is the situation as bad as it’s painted?

I would completely challenge that. We’ve had a lot of focus on pharmaceuticals and the strict regulatory environment and compliance approval process. The level of rigour that is required to achieve and maintain GDP (Good Distribution Practice) status leaves no room for any level of mishandling by carriers that have been awarded accreditations like GDP or IATA CEIV Pharma.

Obviously, if there are any companies still choosing to place high value, temperature-sensitive pharma shipments with carriers that are not able to demonstrate the processes required to achieve those statuses, then they may be open to the possibility of mishandling.

However, our experience of pharma companies and their forwarding partners is that they are very professional and knowledgeable, and they can easily identify the ‘haves’ from the ‘have nots’. Pharma business is making a really important contribution to our growth, but we clearly understand we have to earn that, based on our performance for every single shipment.         

Why have you changed cargo handling in Australia to Menzies?

As we develop our services across Australia, we believe that Menzies Aviation is the right partner to help us achieve our goals in this market.  The new three-year cargo handling contract is already under way. Menzies took over our handling operation in Melbourne on June 8,  Brisbane followed 9 July and Sydney is 7 August. 

Are there likely to be any staff changes at VA?

We recently announced that our chief executive Craig Kreeger will retire in January 2019.  Craig will be replaced by an internal appointment, Shai Weiss. Shai is currently chief commercial officer and has been with the airline since July 2014, having previously worked with a number of Virgin businesses.  Cargo reported to Shai when he was chief financial officer back in 2016 and he’s a great champion of the contribution the team make to the overall business.

What is your view on gender equality and how would it affect the air cargo business?

Our people are at the heart of everything we do and are our greatest strength. I am pleased that within cargo our balance on gender equality is in fact that - balanced, with the proportion of males to females within the majority of roles at all levels being equal.  There is always more we can do to and we’re committed to making a positive difference to create an even more inclusive culture at Virgin Atlantic. 

With the new VA/Air France Group/Delta jv moving ahead, what changes are your customers likely to see?

It is too early to say as we’re working through the agreement, but we are excited at the prospect of what the extended JV could offer our cargo customers.

Australia steps up biosecurity protection - with bigger budgets to back up streamlining efforts

AUSTRALIA is improving its biosecurity protection systems in terms of investment, new techniques and services and streamlining of processes.

The Department of Agriculture and Water Resource’s new automatic entry processing (AEP) model gives substance to the agency’s claim that it is “committed to streamlining the import process to provide subtle but welcome benefits” to the import sector.

Amendments to AEP procedures have been implemented to simplify the lodgement of importation declarations and give greater flexibility without compromising the country’s biosecurity integrity.

Says a DAWR backgrounder: ‘These enhancements will provide greater support for industry participants, such as Custom brokers, to conduct document assessments and reduce system limitations when directing specific goods for release or for additional biosecurity measures, such as inspection or fumigation.

‘The program update will also promote the incorporation of a wider range of commodities and changes to our verification regime will reward demonstrated compliance with reduced intervention.’

Peta Lane, first assistant secretary of the Department’s compliance division, said the new AEP model is one of the next steps in developing closer relationships with industry.

“The system has been simplified and delivers greater accessibility and flexibility to both industry and the department. Streamlining is providing even greater ease and efficiency for industry participants.”

DAWR has been working with industry to provide more information and support about these changes.

“Whilst the project will deliver a system that provides greater capacity to expand the arrangement, there has also been a focus on communication, information support and training through the Continued Biosecurity Competency (CBC) program and enhancements to Australia’s Biosecurity Import Conditions system, BICON.”

The Federal government is investing heavily in smart technology to take biosecurity protection to another level.

David Littleproud, the minister responsible for biosecurity under his agriculture and water resources portfolio, recently announced a further A$137.8 million allocation over five years.  Added to funding outlined in this year’s Budget that takes this year’s biosecurity commitment to A$313 million, again spread over five years.

Some of the measures are maritime-specific or for processing inbound air passengers, but many of the measures will relate to air cargo directly or as a general good.

For instance, A$36.5 million will be spent on building up a team of biosecurity analytics specialists to identify which countries and imports are likely to bring in pests and diseases.

“Our data and analytics will also tell us when pests are extending their range in other countries which could heighten our exposure to them,” explained Littleproud.

In the ‘greater good’ category, with the potential to ward off a biosecurity incursion which could affect air cargo such as thoroughbred horses or top-end horticultural product, is an Indigenous Biosecurity Rangers program.  This will employ 69 groups of rangers along the 10,000km northern Australian coastline and Torres Strait Islands.

“We have set aside A$35 million in contingency funding, ready to go if we do face an incursion we need to stamp out,” noted Littleproud.

“Another A$7.6 million over five years will establish and appoint an ongoing Environmental Biosecurity Protection Officer and staff within the Department of Agriculture. This officer and his or her staff would prepare plans and invest in projects to keep out environmental threats including the Asian black spined toad, which is similar to the cane toad.”

Comment: Presidential trade moves unwelcome, but we’ll survive

Like him or loathe him, US president Donald Trump’s decisions and sometimes fluid policy positions have an impact on world trade.

And that means whatever POTUS in Washington does, it is relevant in Australia, New Zealand and our fellow Asia-Pacific nations.

Not just to countries in general, either. 

A major US trade decision could affect our businesses and our personal wellbeing.  POTUS may no longer hold the ‘leader of the western world’ position, but the person in the oval office still wields enormous power.

Doubtless Trump does not stare out at the rose garden worrying about a freight forwarder in Sydney, a Customs broker in Perth or a freighter crew moving a much-wanted load across Australasian skies.

But when he unilaterally declares a trade war with China or triggers an acrimonious dispute with Canada,  we suffer eventually through a downturn in traffic, volatility in business confidence and a slide into the economic doldrums.

This is not to say that another global financial crisis is nigh. 

The Asia Pacific region is well-placed to ride out short-term vagaries of Trump brinkmanship – an old-fashioned term but seemingly appropriate for this outside-the-square president.

Nor is it likely to trigger a modern-day US depression - especially with tax cuts as a cushion - but when you have major brands beginning to worry about supply chain dependability because the country’s leader wants to focus on local rather than global, the resulting uncertainty might become toxic.

Trump’s hints about withdrawal from the World Trade Organisation are unlikely to be consummated, but his distrust of rules-based global trade relationships is not just political grandstanding.

Meantime, Australia and NZ are marching along with some confidence in signing or negotiating free trade agreements that will act as a buffer to US-generated disruption.

We’re moving towards ratification of the Trans Pacific Partnership Mk II - minus the US - and we’re talking new arrangements with the UK and EU post-Brexit.  We’ve also moved closer to Japan, which is showing global leadership in the renewed TPP and other trade arrangements.

Even PACER Plus, the South Pacific multi-national trade agreement (which hit problems with the last-minute withdrawal of Fiji and Papua New Guinea), is firming up - and with PNG signalling a possible change of mind, it could become the force it was once envisaged.

PNG seems to be taking a proactive approach to international trade, talking of FTAs with China, the UK and other partners.  It augurs well for the region.

- Kelvin King

US air cargo measures impact Australia, with new progams added

READERS will be aware that as of July 2017, all Australian air cargo exports to the United States have been required to undergo new piece level screening to accommodate the requirements of the US TSA, writes Andrew Hudson.

A summary of the US requirements was set out in my June 21 web article in this publication titled ‘Piece-level screening for Australian exports to the USA is around the corner – I’m glad we’re ready’, with more details to be found at the Department of Home Affairs web site (https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/transport-security/air-cargo-security/changes-us-bound-air-cargo-screening-requirements). 

The revised Australian regime to meet US requirements also introduced concepts such as the Known Consignor (KC) program, which allowed certain exporters to securely screen their own cargo to go directly, without further examination, to a CTO at an airport, as well as the Enhanced Air Cargo Examination (EACE) program which applied to RACAs to examine and scan all other exporters cargo for the US before heading to the CTO. (A CTO can also be a RACA and examine air cargo it receives.)

Although this new regime was initially introduced for exports to the US, there was always an expectation that a similar regime would subsequently be introduced for all other exports by air, whether the result of it being dictated by other countries or by extension by the Australian government.  In this case, the latter has arisen with the Australian government recently announcing that all exports by air will need to be subject to piece-level screening by 1 March 2019.

Based on recent commentary, it seems clear that the changes merely represent the expected extension of the US requirements to meet perceived changes in the general security environment that were always going to be implemented as opposed to a response to a particular threat or a perceived gap in the existing regime.

Given the very-recent announcement of the changes, guidance material for industry has yet to be finalised by Home Affairs. However, industry representatives were briefed on the outline of new regime at the recent meeting of the working group convened by Home Affairs which has taken the place of the earlier ‘cargo working group’ that oversaw the introduction of the US requirements and the development and commencement of the KC program and the EACE program.   It is expected that the new requirements will also be developed in close consultation with industry.

While full details of the new requirements have yet to come to light in detail, a number of general observations can be made at this point

• The intention is for the US air cargo requirements to be replicated for all air cargo exports by 1 March 2019. 

  This would require all air cargo for export to be subjected to ‘piece-level scanning’ before delivery to CTOs at the airport.  For these purposes, scanning would require examination to be undertaken as  x-ray examination, electronic magnetic detection, explosive trace detection or physical examination. The scanning would depend on the goods themselves.

• What constitutes ‘piece-level’ will vary depending on the goods themselves.

• The full suite of US-bound arrangements will be made available for the new requirements, meaning that the KC and EACE programs will be extended to other exporters for other exports. Presumably those parties already in these programs in relation to the US requirements will have their membership extended to apply to the wider export requirements, although there may well be additional requirements for a broader membership.

There is little doubt that some urgent decisions will need to be made. Exporters need to understand the new requirements, the impact on their business, who can assist them best with the requirements and whether the KC represents a useful option, perhaps alongside the Trusted Trader Program. Freight forwarders will need to consider the terms of the RACA and EACE programs and those already providing scanning services for air cargo exports will need to review whether they need to invest further in scanning equipment or facilities - and the impact on their rates.

All parties need to pay attention to the details of the requirements as they are released, whether through the air cargo security part of the Home Affairs web site at https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/transport-security/air-cargo-security, through industry associations or through other sources such as updates from this magazine. Of immediate interest to CBFCA and AFIF members will be air cargo security information sessions being conducted in July and August in conjunction with Home Affairs, CTO operators and providers of scanning technology as described at https://www.cbfca.com.au/CBFCA/News/NNF/2018/NNF_2018_142.aspx.    

Those in the private supply chain will need to review how the new requirements will impact their operations and business costs. As we regularly advise, early preparation is the best option rather than last-minute scrambling in a crowded market.

Of course, if pain persists do not hesitate to contact your friendly neighbourhood Customs, trade and transport lawyer.

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

There’s pressure at the borders, but agencies are dealing with it

THE BORDER protection agencies of both Australia and New Zealand have been under pressure in recent times. Their leadership teams have acknowledged criticism, but also insist that everything is under control.

In the case of NZ it’s something of a ‘bad apples’ clean-up akin to what the Australian Border Force’s legacy agencies had to deal with prior to the renaissance in July 2015.

Michael Outram, ABF’s commissioner, told a Senate select committee in late May he was pretty happy with the way things were.  Lots yet to do, but looking good.

Only a few days later the National Audit Office released a report saying that the Department of Home Affairs had not achieved the increased revenue levels set during the merger.

It also pointed to a number of operational failings.

“The problems and their solutions are known to the department, and it has an action plan to address them, although numerous previous attempts to do so have not been successful,” it said.

The merger was expensive, as we reported at the time, but the intention was to offset this through efficiency savings and in additional revenue raised through better Customs duty compliance.

However, said the report, “the department has not verified whether efficiencies have been delivered in the specific areas which were nominated in the integration business case”.

Nor was the department “achieving commitments made to government in relation to additional revenue”.

“Based on progress to the end of December 2017, if collections continue at the current rate the department will only collect 31.6 per cent of the additional Customs duty revenue to which it committed in the Integration Business Case.”

The Audit Office made three recommendations: That priority be given to “addressing its records and information management deficiencies,” that “contracts be evaluated on completion” and that the department put in place a new plan allowing the government to “assess whether the claimed benefits of integration have been realised”.

All were agreed to.

More criticism came in a report which claimed the ABF’s training college had “over-promised and under-delivered”, officers had abused their powers and some staff lacked the training to do their jobs.

It also alleged some officers were not given time off to attend training courses.

Speaking to the Senate’s estimates, legal and constitutional affairs committee, Outram said in the past 12 months the ABF had achieved a great deal. “Our operational performance has been excellent, against the tide of increases in traveller and trade volumes, and in a difficult and changing threat environment.

“At the same time we have seamlessly established the ABF within the Home Affairs portfolio as an independent operational body.”

He acknowledged that “realising our full potential will require that we continue to improve in some key foundational areas’.

Improvements were under way. “For example, by developing contemporary operational doctrine, with a stronger intelligence focus, and the necessary operating procedures and training that sit above it.

“Also by enhancing medical and fitness standards, officer mobility, uniform standards and dress code, reviewing and enhancing our procedures and leadership competencies, making our training more accessible and improving administrative compliance.”

Outram stressed ABF “will also continue to relentlessly seek to identify and appropriately deal with any person in our organisation whose standard of integrity or behaviour falls beneath that required of an ABF officer”.

This issue is being addressed by NZ Customs following the revelation that 60 staff had been investigated for code of conduct breaches over the past five years.  These issues included using and selling drugs, fraud, theft, not showing up for work and accessing information without the appropriate clearance.

A news organisation, NewsHub, obtained the data in documents released under the Official Information Act.

Following investigation, 40 staff faced disciplinary action which included formal warnings, demotions and being fired – 11 were either fired or resigned.

Customs said it was on top of the problem and encouraged further whistle-blowing by staff.

India-Australia study finds 10 areas suitable for trade

A report commissioned by the Federal Government to ‘unlock’ the potential for trade with India has identified 10 sectors where Australia’s advantages match India’s needs and 10 states in India where Australian traders could best focus their efforts.

Key recommendations for these sectors and markets are detailed in the report.

Titled An India Economic Strategy to 2035: Navigating from Potential to Delivery, it was researched and written by Peter Varghese AO, chancellor of the University of Queensland and former secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

A copy can be found at indiaeconomicstrategy.dfat.gov.au.

The brief instructed Varghese to look beyond the immediate horizon and provide a roadmap for unlocking the opportunities that would help India and Australia grow together.

It is been described as being about cementing India in as a priority economic partner.

Australia has enjoyed 27 years of consecutive annual economic growth, but government policy – and common sense – is to continue seeking out new markets and opportunity.

This strategy is directly aligned with the continuing well-being of international air cargo and the Australian transport and logistics sector.

The report judges that no single market over the next 20 years will offer more growth opportunities for Australia than India. By 2035, India will overtake China as the world’s most populous country. It also is poised to become the third-largest economy after China and the United States.

India’s scale alone encourages ambition, but it is the is the complementary areas between Australia’s and India’s economies that will determine success.

The foundations for an enhanced economic partnership with India are strong, underpinned by people-to-people ties and shared values.

The Government is now consulting with Australian and Indian stakeholders on how best to progress the report’s recommendations.

The report identifies 10 sectors where Australia’s competitive advantages match India’s needs, and 10 states in India where Australia should focus efforts. Key recommendations for these sectors and markets are detailed in the report.

The Government will consider its response to Varghese’s report following consultation with Australian and Indian stakeholders.

The Foreign Policy White Paper places India in the front rank of Australia’s international partnerships, recognising converging strategic interests. Implementation of the report’s findings will give similar priority to the economic dimension of the relationship.

A copy of the report can be found at indiaeconomicstrategy.dfat.gov.au.

Sydney Gateway has its benefits, but it misses opportunities to help freight industry cope with its growth - AFIF

Australia’s New South Wales government has released plans for Sydney Gateway, a new toll-free motorway connection between the new M5 interchange at St Peters and the airport that will cut travel times from Parramatta to Sydney Airport by up to 40 minutes and from Campbelltown to Sydney Airport by up to 20 minutes.

The Sydney Gateway will also include:

  Relocation and reconfiguration of Airport Drive, connecting to the International Terminal.

  Major upgrades to Qantas Drive and Joyce Drive around the Domestic Terminal, including a redesigned intersection into the Terminal.

• Duplication of the Port Botany freight rail line, to increase freight rail capacity to Australia’s largest container port.

The new toll free M12 motorway will service Western Sydney Airport at Badgerys Creek.

Sydney Gateway will be subject to comprehensive environmental assessment to secure planning approvals, with the community invited to provide feedback at key stages.

The NSW government says it will work closely with Sydney Airport Corporation, the Australian Rail Track Corporation and other key stakeholders to progress Sydney Gateway and minimise impacts on the community during delivery.

Subject to planning approvals, the road components of Sydney Gateway are expected to be complete in 2023, with an estimated cost between A$2.2 and A$2.6 billion.

However, the Sydney Gateway project is welcome but does not go far enough to reduce heavy container freight truck volumes, according to the Australian Federation of International Forwarders (AFIF).

Brian Lovell, chief executive of AFIF says more needs to be done to alleviate worsening traffic bottlenecks that could impact Australia’s key import /export trading sector.

  “AFIF supports infrastructure development to improve traffic flows and reduce congestion around the airport and port freight precincts. However, this project does little to serve the best interests of the road and air freight industry,” said Lovell.

“The Port Botany Rail Duplication is long overdue and will assist with the flow of containers by rail to and from Port Botany.

But: “The Sydney Gateway road extension stops at the domestic passenger terminal and does not connect to Port Botany, so the truck congestion around the local roads in the Mascot and Botany port precinct will continue to grow - especially during the construction phase until 2023.

“Widening Joyce Drive to three lanes each way and replacing the rail level-crossing at General Holmes Drive with a new railway underpass at Wentworth Avenue will assist road traffic flow to the airport, however Foreshore Drive and Botany Road will continue to carry heavy container truck volumes into the future.

“Sydney Airport Corp’s granting of an easement to the NSW Government on the Northern Lands area for A$170 million, to enable Sydney Gateway to be built there, effectively removes another location for the CTOs to develop their on-airport operations.

“It appears the priorities of the road and air freight industry are bypassed in the planning process, again,” Lovell concluded.

‘Pathways to the future’ theme well-supported at CBAFF meet

THIS year’s annual conference of Customs Brokers and Freight Forwarders Federation of NZ www.cbaff.org.nz continued the organisation’s well-supported policy of looking more to the practical than the philosophical, aiming its program at having members learn, benefit directly and get involved through workshops and networking.

Its theme of ‘Pathways to the future’ underlined this approach, with the pathways suggesting ‘innovation, investment and infrastructure’.

An appropriate keynote speaker for the theme was well-known Australian industry executive and CBFCA stalwart Sue Danks, representing BorderWise, which she helped set up with WiseTech Global.

She spoke of the need to continually invest in innovations in technology for border clearance and compliance, pointing to the services provided by BorderWise and WiseTech Global’s huge commitment to research and development projects.

While compliance was an increasing challenge, she said, technology was making it possible to focus on quality and achieve faster transactions.

Not changing is Glenn Coldham of DHL Global Forwarding, who continues to enjoy the confidence of CBAFF members and was re-elected for a fourth term as president. 

Vice presidents are Steve Pugh of GVI Logistics and Chris Edwards of GO Logistics.

This year’s conference, held in Nelson, was the 22nd for CBAFF www.cbaff.org.nz

TAPA publishes all three PSR documents, says many sites  could qualify for Level Three

THE TRANSPORTED Asset Protection Association’s (TAPA’s) commitment to identify and encourage a network of secure parking places for trucks across Europe has taken further significant steps forward.

TAPA has published all three levels of its Parking Security Requirements (PSR) certification program for industry review and the signing of an MoU with Snap Account, the cashless payment system for the haulage industry, which works with more than 3,000 transport operators.

TAPA has also reiterated its strongly-held belief that there are hundreds of professional parking sites in Europe that can already meet its self-certification PSR Level Three, a free-of-charge certification for Parking Place Operators (PPOs) which is available now. The need to protect drivers, their cargo and trucks is increasing demand for more safe and secure parking locations. TAPA is already seeing demand for controlled parking locations outweighing availability on key routes and says PPOs that do meet the TAPA security standard will find a ready-made market of potential customers.

Cargo loss data for 2017 produced by TAPA’s Incident Information Service (IIS) revealed an 89.9 per cent year-on-year rise in the number of freight thefts which occurred when trucks were parked in unsecured parking locations, mostly due to the lack of secure parking options. The over 2,000 such cargo crimes last year also accounted for the majority of the EUR105 million of products stolen from supply chains in the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region.

TAPA is on course to launch the higher Levels 1 and 2 of its Parking Security Requirements as planned later this year following the latest stage of consultation with its Manufacturer and Logistics Service Provider members, who have been asked to review the standards to confirm they are fit for purpose. As well as addressing the critical issue of security, PSR also recognises the importance for sites to provide suitable driver facilities, which remains an important factor for drivers with the ability to choose where they park.

TAPA, which describes its PSR as ‘practical and realistic’ has also launched a new membership category for Parking Place Operators (PPO) to increase their engagement with customers, and extended its Security Service Provider membership to include Parking Booking Platform Operators.

Its secure parking program has been boosted by the signing of an MoU with Snap Account, which completes over one million transactions a year for transport companies.

Interview: Virgin Atlantic to stay focused on strengths as it moves to implement new three-way jv

DOMINIC Kennedy was appointed managing director of Virgin Atlantic Cargo in August 2017, bringing a wealth of cargo knowledge and experience to the role as a key member of the airline’s cargo leadership team since 2008.

In his previous post of director, Commercial Planning, Dominic was responsible for the commercial planning of Virgin Atlantic’s cargo division, leading its commercial activities to achieve agreed targets and standards for financial and trading performance as well as service quality.

This role incorporated functional responsibility for revenue management, capacity control, pricing, commercial insight, revenue integrity and joint venture activities - helping the airline to maximise the business potential of its global network.

Dominic joined Virgin Atlantic in March 2005 in the airline’s Fleet and Network planning team, providing revenue analysis on all business propositions affecting Virgin Atlantic’s capacity and revenue, including aircraft acquisition, new route studies, configuration changes and product investment.

He moved to the airline’s Cargo division in 2008 to create and manage a centralised Price and Product team to focus on all aspects of pricing as well as management of internal and external incentive programs, the development of sales intelligence capabilities, commercial contracting, product strategy and interline agreements.

In November 2010, he was given responsibility for Virgin Atlantic Cargo’s Revenue Management and Capacity Control function, accountable for optimising the return on its global cargo capacity. This included route management, capacity control, operational research and ULD control.

In this interview, Kennedy explains his global vision and priorities for the airline and the greater role digitisation is playing in cargo logistics.

 

You’ve been in your role for nearly 12 months. How has it gone and what are your priorities?

Dominic Kennedy: We had a great year in 2017 which saw our volumes grow six per cent to a five-year high and our revenues increase nine per cent year-on-year. 

We’ve seen a continuation of that growth in 2018 and although we set a fairly ambitious target for this year, our latest figures show we’re on track to achieve our goal.

More recently, we’ve seen a slight softening of the ex-UK market versus last year but this was expected given the change in sterling/dollar exchange rates year-on-year. Our business overall from the UK still remains very strong, we’re starting to see more demand for our capacity out of the US, and we’re also getting a positive contribution from the rest of our network serving other important cargo markets including China, India, South Africa, Nigeria and of course Australia.

In terms of priorities, we have three clear areas of focus:  Greater simplicity to make Virgin Atlantic easier to do business with; digitisation through new technologies – our hope is to offer full self-service capability during 2019 and leveraging our partnerships with Delta and Virgin Australia.

In terms of those priorities, where are you today?

We are making some very positive progress. We see some clear linkages between simplicity and digitisation, using new and emerging technologies to drive benefit for our customers when they do business with Virgin Atlantic Cargo. But simplicity is also about us looking at every aspect of our business, to ensure that at all our touch points, we are delivering our product as efficiently as possible.

One clear objective we have is to develop a self-service platform that will enable customers to interact with us in a different way. This will be driven by a recently-advertised role that I introduced to our leadership team, ‘head of Digital and Distribution’, and I expect to make this appointment very soon. It’s a challenge and an opportunity but technology and how we can better-embrace innovation is very exciting in terms of the ability to remove paper, modernise and automate warehouses and deliver self-service for our customers.

If you look at the way the air cargo industry works today, there is so much we can work on together. I think as an industry we’ve seen some positive initial steps in terms of taking paper out of the equation but you only have to walk through a warehouse operation to see how far we still need to go. I have no doubt that new technology will help us further enhance our operational capability.

As consumers, we can all see how the world is changing because we live in an online society where everything moves faster and we have visibility of our purchases from the moment we place an order until the point of delivery.  I want our customers to have the option of being able to do everything they do today through telephone and email via a digital platform: Requesting pricing, creating waybills, ordering AWB stock, accounting, tracking, raising queries.

We’ve got lots of great ideas and now our focus is on working with our partners, handling agents and a soon-to-be-announced technology provider to ensure we can deliver a seamless experience for our customers.

This will also support the business in terms of leveraging our partnerships. As we more closely align with our JV partner, Delta Cargo, we are excited by the shared journey we are embarking upon. I’ve had customers tell me they love working with Virgin but they wish we were the size of Delta. Customers increasingly are demanding scale and reach, and partnering with Delta gives us and our customers much more choice than before. We’re into the implementation stage of our Winning Together strategy with Delta, and we’re learning a lot from each other. We’re excited about our teams coming together and collectively pooling ideas and experiences. This is certainly helped by the fact that our JV partner is also a shareholder so has a clear interest in the success of Virgin Atlantic. The main thing is that we want to build a JV that offers clear and meaningful benefits for our customers but which still enables them to express their airline of choice to work with.

You’ve worked with Virgin Australia for a long time. How is that relationship performing?

It will be 10 years in 2019. We really enjoy working with the Virgin Australia Cargo team and supporting the airline’s long-haul international route expansion. Its services from Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne to Los Angeles are well established and the launch of Melbourne-Hong Kong and now Sydney-Hong Kong have added a very positive new dimension. Customers in Asia and Australia are extremely positive about additional capacity on such prime routes to and from Greater China. The e-commerce market in the region alone is among the fastest-growing in the world.

Our team in Australia are especially happy to be marketing Sydney-Hong Kong again. It’s a route we know well, having operated it ourselves until mid-2014, so we’re expecting it to get off to a very positive start. 

IATA says international airfreight market growth is slowing after customer stock levels largely were replenished in Q1.  Do you see room for strong growth in 2018-19?

Absolutely. Our pharma product is going from strength to strength, we are being inundated with two-pallet car bookings, the perishable season relies on speed to market and our reliability for offering a simple but effective service will put us in a strong position for this year and next.

Brexit keeps dragging on, with sceptics concerned about trucking delays at ferry terminals and the issue of the Irish border. Is there a bright side to Brexit for VA Cargo or is it all ‘wait and see’?

We are actively engaged in a number of external groups and industry bodies to understand the implications of Brexit, the risks and opportunities, and trying to ensure the UK government hears the voice of the cargo industry. We meet regularly with the Department for Transport and will continue to do so as the government sets out its plans.

We want to see positive progress as quickly as possible, and  we will explore any opportunities that emerge from the final deal.   The frictionless movement of goods between the UK and EU is essential, as a significant proportion of air freight arrives from the EU by road, rail, or sea, before boarding our aircraft.  We need to ensure that goods can continue to flow seamlessly across borders as they do today.          

What is Virgin Atlantic Cargo’s take on blockchain? Are you going to adopt it in any way?

I’m excited by the potential of blockchain but we still have a lot to do and learn. We are actively exploring how blockchain can support our digital ambitions and the modernisation of our business. A secure ledger that removes paper from the point a purchase order is raised through to the receipt of goods by the consumer, for example, will represent a big step forward.

Virgin Atlantic has enjoyed success with specialist cargo programs such as pharma and high value freight. Other airlines seem focused on the same segments – are you diversifying and targeting any other potentially-lucrative verticals?

Pharma is a real success story for us. Our volumes in the first five months of 2018 were around 50 per cent higher year-on-year and we’re building a very solid reputation. The opening of our Pharma Zone with Delta Cargo at Heathrow in October 2017 was a sign of our intent and we’ve now confirmed our GDP compliance for both the Pharma Zone and our global headquarters.  We expect our best-ever year for pharma in this fast-growing, very specialist and highly-regulated part of the air cargo market.

We’re also seeing the benefit of being a big player on the transatlantic market, which is the world’s biggest pharma trade lane. Alongside our JV partner, Delta Cargo, we now offer around a quarter of all transatlantic cargo capacity. We’re also seeing our pharma volumes increase on our China and India routes. Similarly, our network is ideal to support the growth of e-commerce volumes, again to and from the US as well as major markets in China and Australia, the latter through our partnership with Virgin Australia.

Moving high value cargo has been a specialisation of ours for a long time, including two-pallet prestige car shipments. Overall, we remain committed to selling a simple product portfolio, one that’s easy to understand and delivers what we promise. That’s what our customers tell us they want and it is going to give us the best financial return.        

There have been recent reports claiming pharma airfreight consignments are prone to mishandling, leading to high losses for those customers. Is the situation as bad as it’s painted?

I would completely challenge that. We’ve had a lot of focus on pharmaceuticals and the strict regulatory environment and compliance approval process. The level of rigour that is required to achieve and maintain GDP (Good Distribution Practice) status leaves no room for any level of mishandling by carriers that have been awarded accreditations like GDP or IATA CEIV Pharma.

Obviously, if there are any companies still choosing to place high value, temperature-sensitive pharma shipments with carriers that are not able to demonstrate the processes required to achieve those statuses, then they may be open to the possibility of mishandling.

However, our experience of pharma companies and their forwarding partners is that they are very professional and knowledgeable, and they can easily identify the ‘haves’ from the ‘have nots’. Pharma business is making a really important contribution to our growth, but we clearly understand we have to earn that, based on our performance for every single shipment.         

Why have you changed cargo handling in Australia to Menzies?

As we develop our services across Australia, we believe that Menzies Aviation is the right partner to help us achieve our goals in this market.  The new three-year cargo handling contract is already under way. Menzies took over our handling operation in Melbourne on June 8,  Brisbane followed 9 July and Sydney is 7 August. 

Are there likely to be any staff changes at VA?

We recently announced that our chief executive Craig Kreeger will retire in January 2019.  Craig will be replaced by an internal appointment, Shai Weiss. Shai is currently chief commercial officer and has been with the airline since July 2014, having previously worked with a number of Virgin businesses.  Cargo reported to Shai when he was chief financial officer back in 2016 and he’s a great champion of the contribution the team make to the overall business.

What is your view on gender equality and how would it affect the air cargo business?

Our people are at the heart of everything we do and are our greatest strength. I am pleased that within cargo our balance on gender equality is in fact that - balanced, with the proportion of males to females within the majority of roles at all levels being equal.  There is always more we can do to and we’re committed to making a positive difference to create an even more inclusive culture at Virgin Atlantic. 

With the new VA/Air France Group/Delta jv moving ahead, what changes are your customers likely to see?

It is too early to say as we’re working through the agreement, but we are excited at the prospect of what the extended JV could offer our cargo customers.

Australia steps up biosecurity protection - with bigger budgets to back up streamlining efforts

AUSTRALIA is improving its biosecurity protection systems in terms of investment, new techniques and services and streamlining of processes.

The Department of Agriculture and Water Resource’s new automatic entry processing (AEP) model gives substance to the agency’s claim that it is “committed to streamlining the import process to provide subtle but welcome benefits” to the import sector.

Amendments to AEP procedures have been implemented to simplify the lodgement of importation declarations and give greater flexibility without compromising the country’s biosecurity integrity.

Says a DAWR backgrounder: ‘These enhancements will provide greater support for industry participants, such as Custom brokers, to conduct document assessments and reduce system limitations when directing specific goods for release or for additional biosecurity measures, such as inspection or fumigation.

‘The program update will also promote the incorporation of a wider range of commodities and changes to our verification regime will reward demonstrated compliance with reduced intervention.’

Peta Lane, first assistant secretary of the Department’s compliance division, said the new AEP model is one of the next steps in developing closer relationships with industry.

“The system has been simplified and delivers greater accessibility and flexibility to both industry and the department. Streamlining is providing even greater ease and efficiency for industry participants.”

DAWR has been working with industry to provide more information and support about these changes.

“Whilst the project will deliver a system that provides greater capacity to expand the arrangement, there has also been a focus on communication, information support and training through the Continued Biosecurity Competency (CBC) program and enhancements to Australia’s Biosecurity Import Conditions system, BICON.”

The Federal government is investing heavily in smart technology to take biosecurity protection to another level.

David Littleproud, the minister responsible for biosecurity under his agriculture and water resources portfolio, recently announced a further A$137.8 million allocation over five years.  Added to funding outlined in this year’s Budget that takes this year’s biosecurity commitment to A$313 million, again spread over five years.

Some of the measures are maritime-specific or for processing inbound air passengers, but many of the measures will relate to air cargo directly or as a general good.

For instance, A$36.5 million will be spent on building up a team of biosecurity analytics specialists to identify which countries and imports are likely to bring in pests and diseases.

“Our data and analytics will also tell us when pests are extending their range in other countries which could heighten our exposure to them,” explained Littleproud.

In the ‘greater good’ category, with the potential to ward off a biosecurity incursion which could affect air cargo such as thoroughbred horses or top-end horticultural product, is an Indigenous Biosecurity Rangers program.  This will employ 69 groups of rangers along the 10,000km northern Australian coastline and Torres Strait Islands.

“We have set aside A$35 million in contingency funding, ready to go if we do face an incursion we need to stamp out,” noted Littleproud.

“Another A$7.6 million over five years will establish and appoint an ongoing Environmental Biosecurity Protection Officer and staff within the Department of Agriculture. This officer and his or her staff would prepare plans and invest in projects to keep out environmental threats including the Asian black spined toad, which is similar to the cane toad.”

Comment: Presidential trade moves unwelcome, but we’ll survive

Like him or loathe him, US president Donald Trump’s decisions and sometimes fluid policy positions have an impact on world trade.

And that means whatever POTUS in Washington does, it is relevant in Australia, New Zealand and our fellow Asia-Pacific nations.

Not just to countries in general, either. 

A major US trade decision could affect our businesses and our personal wellbeing.  POTUS may no longer hold the ‘leader of the western world’ position, but the person in the oval office still wields enormous power.

Doubtless Trump does not stare out at the rose garden worrying about a freight forwarder in Sydney, a Customs broker in Perth or a freighter crew moving a much-wanted load across Australasian skies.

But when he unilaterally declares a trade war with China or triggers an acrimonious dispute with Canada,  we suffer eventually through a downturn in traffic, volatility in business confidence and a slide into the economic doldrums.

This is not to say that another global financial crisis is nigh. 

The Asia Pacific region is well-placed to ride out short-term vagaries of Trump brinkmanship – an old-fashioned term but seemingly appropriate for this outside-the-square president.

Nor is it likely to trigger a modern-day US depression - especially with tax cuts as a cushion - but when you have major brands beginning to worry about supply chain dependability because the country’s leader wants to focus on local rather than global, the resulting uncertainty might become toxic.

Trump’s hints about withdrawal from the World Trade Organisation are unlikely to be consummated, but his distrust of rules-based global trade relationships is not just political grandstanding.

Meantime, Australia and NZ are marching along with some confidence in signing or negotiating free trade agreements that will act as a buffer to US-generated disruption.

We’re moving towards ratification of the Trans Pacific Partnership Mk II - minus the US - and we’re talking new arrangements with the UK and EU post-Brexit.  We’ve also moved closer to Japan, which is showing global leadership in the renewed TPP and other trade arrangements.

Even PACER Plus, the South Pacific multi-national trade agreement (which hit problems with the last-minute withdrawal of Fiji and Papua New Guinea), is firming up - and with PNG signalling a possible change of mind, it could become the force it was once envisaged.

PNG seems to be taking a proactive approach to international trade, talking of FTAs with China, the UK and other partners.  It augurs well for the region.

- Kelvin King

US air cargo measures impact Australia, with new progams added

READERS will be aware that as of July 2017, all Australian air cargo exports to the United States have been required to undergo new piece level screening to accommodate the requirements of the US TSA, writes Andrew Hudson.

A summary of the US requirements was set out in my June 21 web article in this publication titled ‘Piece-level screening for Australian exports to the USA is around the corner – I’m glad we’re ready’, with more details to be found at the Department of Home Affairs web site (https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/transport-security/air-cargo-security/changes-us-bound-air-cargo-screening-requirements). 

The revised Australian regime to meet US requirements also introduced concepts such as the Known Consignor (KC) program, which allowed certain exporters to securely screen their own cargo to go directly, without further examination, to a CTO at an airport, as well as the Enhanced Air Cargo Examination (EACE) program which applied to RACAs to examine and scan all other exporters cargo for the US before heading to the CTO. (A CTO can also be a RACA and examine air cargo it receives.)

Although this new regime was initially introduced for exports to the US, there was always an expectation that a similar regime would subsequently be introduced for all other exports by air, whether the result of it being dictated by other countries or by extension by the Australian government.  In this case, the latter has arisen with the Australian government recently announcing that all exports by air will need to be subject to piece-level screening by 1 March 2019.

Based on recent commentary, it seems clear that the changes merely represent the expected extension of the US requirements to meet perceived changes in the general security environment that were always going to be implemented as opposed to a response to a particular threat or a perceived gap in the existing regime.

Given the very-recent announcement of the changes, guidance material for industry has yet to be finalised by Home Affairs. However, industry representatives were briefed on the outline of new regime at the recent meeting of the working group convened by Home Affairs which has taken the place of the earlier ‘cargo working group’ that oversaw the introduction of the US requirements and the development and commencement of the KC program and the EACE program.   It is expected that the new requirements will also be developed in close consultation with industry.

While full details of the new requirements have yet to come to light in detail, a number of general observations can be made at this point

• The intention is for the US air cargo requirements to be replicated for all air cargo exports by 1 March 2019. 

  This would require all air cargo for export to be subjected to ‘piece-level scanning’ before delivery to CTOs at the airport.  For these purposes, scanning would require examination to be undertaken as  x-ray examination, electronic magnetic detection, explosive trace detection or physical examination. The scanning would depend on the goods themselves.

• What constitutes ‘piece-level’ will vary depending on the goods themselves.

• The full suite of US-bound arrangements will be made available for the new requirements, meaning that the KC and EACE programs will be extended to other exporters for other exports. Presumably those parties already in these programs in relation to the US requirements will have their membership extended to apply to the wider export requirements, although there may well be additional requirements for a broader membership.

There is little doubt that some urgent decisions will need to be made. Exporters need to understand the new requirements, the impact on their business, who can assist them best with the requirements and whether the KC represents a useful option, perhaps alongside the Trusted Trader Program. Freight forwarders will need to consider the terms of the RACA and EACE programs and those already providing scanning services for air cargo exports will need to review whether they need to invest further in scanning equipment or facilities - and the impact on their rates.

All parties need to pay attention to the details of the requirements as they are released, whether through the air cargo security part of the Home Affairs web site at https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/transport-security/air-cargo-security, through industry associations or through other sources such as updates from this magazine. Of immediate interest to CBFCA and AFIF members will be air cargo security information sessions being conducted in July and August in conjunction with Home Affairs, CTO operators and providers of scanning technology as described at https://www.cbfca.com.au/CBFCA/News/NNF/2018/NNF_2018_142.aspx.    

Those in the private supply chain will need to review how the new requirements will impact their operations and business costs. As we regularly advise, early preparation is the best option rather than last-minute scrambling in a crowded market.

Of course, if pain persists do not hesitate to contact your friendly neighbourhood Customs, trade and transport lawyer.

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

There’s pressure at the borders, but agencies are dealing with it

THE BORDER protection agencies of both Australia and New Zealand have been under pressure in recent times. Their leadership teams have acknowledged criticism, but also insist that everything is under control.

In the case of NZ it’s something of a ‘bad apples’ clean-up akin to what the Australian Border Force’s legacy agencies had to deal with prior to the renaissance in July 2015.

Michael Outram, ABF’s commissioner, told a Senate select committee in late May he was pretty happy with the way things were.  Lots yet to do, but looking good.

Only a few days later the National Audit Office released a report saying that the Department of Home Affairs had not achieved the increased revenue levels set during the merger.

It also pointed to a number of operational failings.

“The problems and their solutions are known to the department, and it has an action plan to address them, although numerous previous attempts to do so have not been successful,” it said.

The merger was expensive, as we reported at the time, but the intention was to offset this through efficiency savings and in additional revenue raised through better Customs duty compliance.

However, said the report, “the department has not verified whether efficiencies have been delivered in the specific areas which were nominated in the integration business case”.

Nor was the department “achieving commitments made to government in relation to additional revenue”.

“Based on progress to the end of December 2017, if collections continue at the current rate the department will only collect 31.6 per cent of the additional Customs duty revenue to which it committed in the Integration Business Case.”

The Audit Office made three recommendations: That priority be given to “addressing its records and information management deficiencies,” that “contracts be evaluated on completion” and that the department put in place a new plan allowing the government to “assess whether the claimed benefits of integration have been realised”.

All were agreed to.

More criticism came in a report which claimed the ABF’s training college had “over-promised and under-delivered”, officers had abused their powers and some staff lacked the training to do their jobs.

It also alleged some officers were not given time off to attend training courses.

Speaking to the Senate’s estimates, legal and constitutional affairs committee, Outram said in the past 12 months the ABF had achieved a great deal. “Our operational performance has been excellent, against the tide of increases in traveller and trade volumes, and in a difficult and changing threat environment.

“At the same time we have seamlessly established the ABF within the Home Affairs portfolio as an independent operational body.”

He acknowledged that “realising our full potential will require that we continue to improve in some key foundational areas’.

Improvements were under way. “For example, by developing contemporary operational doctrine, with a stronger intelligence focus, and the necessary operating procedures and training that sit above it.

“Also by enhancing medical and fitness standards, officer mobility, uniform standards and dress code, reviewing and enhancing our procedures and leadership competencies, making our training more accessible and improving administrative compliance.”

Outram stressed ABF “will also continue to relentlessly seek to identify and appropriately deal with any person in our organisation whose standard of integrity or behaviour falls beneath that required of an ABF officer”.

This issue is being addressed by NZ Customs following the revelation that 60 staff had been investigated for code of conduct breaches over the past five years.  These issues included using and selling drugs, fraud, theft, not showing up for work and accessing information without the appropriate clearance.

A news organisation, NewsHub, obtained the data in documents released under the Official Information Act.

Following investigation, 40 staff faced disciplinary action which included formal warnings, demotions and being fired – 11 were either fired or resigned.

Customs said it was on top of the problem and encouraged further whistle-blowing by staff.